Home Blog Page 90

SpaceX valued at just $780 billion by Morningstar, less than half its IPO target

0
SpaceX valued at just $780 billion by Morningstar, less than half its IPO target


SpaceX (SPAX.PVT) just got slapped with a bearish valuation ahead of its monster IPO coming up later this month. The report signals that one of the most anticipated offerings in years may be significantly overpriced, just as CEO Elon Musk tries to justify the valuation.

Morningstar initiated coverage of SpaceX with a fair-value estimate of just $780 billion, less than half the roughly $1.8 trillion valuation the company is targeting in its initial public offering.

Analyst Nicolas Owens’s discounted cash flow model valued SpaceX’s core launch and Starlink satellite businesses at about $611 billion in enterprise value, plus an additional $170 billion in “probability-weighted scenarios” for the company’s AI operations.

Translation: Don’t buy at the IPO price.

“We think the company has been significantly overvalued and investors will have opportunities to buy the stock at more attractive levels after the IPO,” Owens said.

Morningstar’s valuation rests on the strength of the company’s launch and connectivity businesses. SpaceX launched 83% of the mass sent to orbit from Earth in 2025 and reduced launch cost per by more than 95%, Owens noted. Starlink, described as the company’s main near-term cash engine, reported 50% revenue growth to $11.3 billion in 2025 and operating income exceeding $4.4 billion.

Morningstar assigned SpaceX a narrow economic moat, citing the cost advantages of its reusable rockets and the scale of its Starlink constellation, but said the recently acquired AI business drags the rating down because its prospects and initiatives — like orbital data centers — are too uncertain.

Morningstar modeled three scenarios for SpaceX’s plan to place data centers in space, ranging from a “moonshot” case, which it values at $1.3 trillion but gives only a 7% chance, to a “no go” case that it assigns a 43% probability and that would destroy more than $81 billion in value.

“We think the most likely path to a durable edge for xAI is through its space-based infrastructure, but we are uncertain about the scientific and economic feasibility of such a plan,” Owens wrote.

The analysts also flagged governance concerns, including Musk’s expected 85% voting control through a dual-class structure and the related-party nature of the xAI merger, which was not conducted at arm’s length.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket is displayed at a SpaceX facility on April 2, 2026, in Hawthorne, Calif. (Mario Tama/Getty Images) · Mario Tama via Getty Images

According to the Morningstar analysts, SpaceX is preparing to offer around 3% of its shares to the public after a series of private rounds, including a $250 billion deal in early 2026 to acquire xAI, Musk’s AI lab, which gave SpaceX a valuation near $1.5 trillion.

Morningstar believes SpaceX will raise around $50 billion to $80 billion from the IPO, with fresh capital needed for additional research and development, AI infrastructure, and Starlink deployment.

Musk has been talking up SpaceX’s sky-high valuation and future prospects by linking it to his other company, Tesla (TSLA).

“Tesla IPO market cap was 0.1% of its current value,” Musk wrote on X early Tuesday morning, replying to a tweet that Tesla is now worth north of $1.3 trillion.

Setting aside Musk’s PR campaign for the IPO, despite the valuation gap, Morningstar expects SpaceX stock to hold up immediately after the offering, citing a small initial float, strong investor appetite for AI infrastructure, and a path to inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 Index just 15 trading days after the IPO.

But selling pressure is likely to build in the following months as stock held by private investors exits the various lock-up periods and large quantities of stock hit the public market, which might become a buying opportunity.

“We think long-term investors eager to participate in SpaceX’s future endeavors and potential success will have opportunities to do so with more margin of safety than the initial offering is likely to provide,” Owens said.

Pras Subramanian is Lead Transportation Reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can follow him on X and on Instagram.

Click here for the latest technology news that will impact the stock market

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance





Source link

Bitcoin (BTC) faces an ‘identity crisis’ and DeFi devs need to stop acting like tech bros

0
Bitcoin (BTC) faces an 'identity crisis' and DeFi devs need to stop acting like tech bros

The cryptocurrency market is enduring a sharp narrative shift, but the real growth is happening away from the spotlight, according to the co-founder of Solana-native yield protocol Solstice Labs.

Ben Nadareski argued that the industry’s biggest asset is experiencing structural confusion in an interview with CoinDesk onvTuesday.

“Bitcoin is going through a bit of an identity crisis right now,” Nadareski said. “It’s not the store of value, like gold, to the masses. It’s also not the speculative investment vehicle that everybody was really attracted to. While bitcoin and the core assets go through their identity crisis, quiet players in the DeFi industry are growing rapidly.”

Decentralized finance’s “silent” growth is heavily challenged by ongoing exploits, according to Nadareski, a flaw he blamed on developers frequently building innovative code while completely ignoring the core responsibilities of managing capital.

“They don’t quite realize you’re now also a financial asset manager if you’re working in DeFi,” Nadareski stated. “That doesn’t mean you’re in tech. That means you’re building tech in financing, which adds two aspects of risk to the market.”

OpenZeppelin co-founder and former CTO Manuel Aráoz said “DeFi is not safe anymore” last month noting that AI coding agents have made smart contracts fatally vulnerable.

Drift Protocol and Kelp Dao were hacked by North Korean cybercriminals in April in two exploits that drained nearly $600 million from the two lending crypto pools. In February 2025, Bybit suffered a $1.46 billion attack, described as the biggest hack of all time.

Nadareski said that to bridge this trust gap, DeFi platforms must hold themselves to traditional banking standards, implementing real-time proof of reserves and automated multi-signature time locks rather than relying on unproven code layers.

DeFi principles

The entry of legacy banking giants does not mean crypto natives have lost the space, Nadareski said. Instead, he pointed to market structure where Wall Street uses faster digital rails for its operational back offices, while decentralized platforms preserve direct user access.

“The convergence is already among us. The institutions have been coming for years and now they are here,” he highlighted.

Winning platforms will be those that accommodate large financial entities while maintaining low fees and equal access for everyday retail users. Since its launch, Solstice has scaled past $500 million in total value locked (TVL) from over 40 institutional allocators, including Galaxy Digital and Susquehanna.

Solstice has also unveiled a strategic partnership with big-data analytics platform ApexE3, which is backed by Consensys and Tensorix.

Treating decentralized networks as a financial utility rather than a tech playground is the only path forward, according to Nasareski.

“Expect more out of DeFi than you do TradFi,” he concluded. “The average retail end-user anywhere in the world should expect 10 times more of an output of transparency, trust, and optimization of their capital.”



Source link

Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund Paused—But Here’s Why He Likely Still Has Legal Immunity

0
Trump’s Anti-Weaponization Fund Paused—But Here’s Why He Likely Still Has Legal Immunity


Topline

The Trump administration said Monday it would halt its new $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund in response to a recent court ruling—but it’s likely the other part of President Donald Trump’s settlement with the IRS, which gives him broad legal immunity, is still in play.

Key Facts

The Justice Department said Monday it was complying with a recent court ruling that temporarily halts Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund from moving forward, amid reports that the Trump administration was pausing the fund in response to criticism from GOP lawmakers.

The $1.776 billion fund for those who feel they’ve been victimized by the DOJ is one of two provisions in Trump’s recent settlement with the IRS, after he sued the agency for allegedly failing in its duty to keep his tax returns confidential.

The other part of the settlement broadly gave Trump, his eldest sons and the Trump Organization—also plaintiffs in the lawsuit—widespread immunity from being sued or prosecuted by the government for acts that had occurred as of the settlement date.

That includes shielding the plaintiffs from having existing tax returns audited by the IRS, but also more broadly says the U.S. is “forever barred” from taking action regarding “any matters currently pending or that could be pending” before other government agencies.

That part of the settlement was not at issue in the lawsuit that paused the $1.8 billion fund, so there is nothing legally stopping the Trump administration from moving forward with Trump’s legal immunity right now, and the DOJ did not say anything on Monday about that provision.

The DOJ has not yet responded to a request for comment on whether the immunity provision is still in effect, or if it proactively paused that part of the settlement as well.

Big Number

$600 million. That’s how much Trump could save if he avoids paying federal taxes for 2025 because of his IRS immunity, Forbes estimates. The New York Times has also separately reported Trump faced a potential $100 million penalty thanks to a tax audit focused on his Chicago skyscraper, though it’s unclear if that audit was still pending when the settlement was reached.

Could Trump’s Legal Immunity Still Be Blocked?

The settlement provision giving Trump some immunity will be harder to challenge in court than the $1.8 billion fund, legal experts cited by The Wall Street Journal noted, though it’s possible a future Democratic-led administration could take action after Trump leaves office. Congress could also pass legislation that would invalidate the settlement, though that remains a longshot with Republicans in control of Congress, and Trump would likely veto any bill challenging his agreement. The judge overseeing Trump’s original lawsuit against the IRS is now weighing whether to reopen the case, in response to a request from former federal judges in light of Trump’s settlement request. That would keep the entire settlement on hold at least while the case remains open, the former judges noted, though it’s unclear if the judge could undo the settlement entirely, or just levy sanctions on Trump and the IRS that punish them for reaching it.

Will The $1.8 Billion Fund Be Reinstated?

It’s unclear. Reports prior to the DOJ’s statement Monday suggested the Trump administration was planning to pause the fund indefinitely in response to GOP criticism, but that was thrown into doubt by the agency’s statement saying only that it would comply with the court’s ruling. The court order only blocks the $1.8 billion fund temporarily while the parties in the lawsuit submit briefs on whether it should be paused for a longer period of time while the litigation is pending. That means there could be another ruling on the fund’s fate as soon as June 12, when a hearing is scheduled in the case. If the court did lift its ruling and allow the fund to move forward, it’s still unclear at that point whether the Trump administration would start it up again, or keep the fund paused to quell Republican lawmakers’ concerns.

Key Background

Trump reached his settlement with the IRS as the judge overseeing the lawsuit was weighing throwing out the case altogether, as it was unclear whether Trump and the IRS he oversees as president were actually opposing parties eligible to be in litigation against each other. The settlement has prompted a widespread backlash, with the “anti-weaponization” fund decried as a “slush fund” for Trump’s political allies, including Jan. 6 rioters. A number of GOP lawmakers have expressed concern about the fund, and the Trump administration’s announcement to pause it—albeit temporarily—came as the fund threatened a separate bill to bankroll Trump’s immigration enforcement priorities. Democrats had been expected to add amendments to that bill that would restrict the $1.8 fund or get rid of it completely, and at least some Republicans were expected to support those amendments, which stopped congressional leaders from bringing the bill up for a vote and threatened it entirely. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., confirmed Monday prior to the DOJ’s announcement that lawmakers were in touch with the White House about making changes to the fund in order for the immigration enforcement bill to move forward.

Further Reading

ForbesTrump’s $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund Is Dead—For NowForbesTrump’s Tax Immunity Could Save Him More Than $600 MillionForbesTrump’s IRS Immunity Deal Sparks Concerns He’s Giving Himself A Self-PardonForbesTrump’s $1.8 Billion ‘Anti-Weaponization’ Fund Blocked In Court—At Least For NowForbesApplicants For Trump’s $1.8B Fund Include Proud Boys Leader, J6 Rioters And George Santos



Source link

Polestar expands into Baltic region with launch in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

0
Polestar expands into Baltic region with launch in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania


Polestar has extended its European presence by entering the Baltic markets of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, taking its global footprint to 31 markets.

The Geely-owned electric vehicle manufacturer is introducing its products in the three countries through a partnership with Volvax Baltic, which will leverage its established retail network across the region.

As part of the rollout, a dedicated Polestar Space is set to open in Tallinn, Estonia, in June 2026.

Additional locations are planned for Riga, Latvia, and Vilnius, Lithuania, later in the year.

Europe remains Polestar’s largest market, representing 78% of the company’s total retail sales volumes during the first quarter of 2026.

The company said the Baltic region’s charging infrastructure continues to develop.

Customers in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania will be able to access the Polestar Charge network, which includes more than 2,800 charging points across the three countries, ranging from high-speed charging stations to local charging options.

Polestar chief commercial officer Scott Dicken said: “Expanding into the Baltic region is a natural next step for Polestar as we continue to grow in Europe, and is part of our journey to grow our sales network in 2026 to 250 locations globally.

“At the same time, we are transforming our retail network to meet customers where they are, with locations designed around test drives, making it easier for more customers to experience our cars. It is a significant achievement for a young brand like Polestar to operate in more than 30 markets.”

The market expansion comes as Polestar faces continued financial pressure despite reporting record retail sales volumes.

For the three months ended 31 March 2026, the company recorded a net loss of $383m, compared with the same period a year earlier, representing a 130.7% year-on-year increase in losses.

Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) loss widened to $235m from $96m in the prior-year period, with tariffs, pricing pressure and currency movements weighing on margins.

Earlier in 2026, Polestar announced plans to expand its electric vehicle portfolio with four new models scheduled for launch between 2026 and 2028 as part of its next phase of growth.

The programme will begin with the Polestar 5 four-door grand tourer, with customer deliveries expected to commence during the summer.

“Polestar expands into Baltic region with launch in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania” was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand.



Source link

‘Not a bet against Arbitrum’ – Why Blockworks is leaving its DAO role

0
‘Not a bet against Arbitrum’ – Why Blockworks is leaving its DAO role


Blockworks Advisory announced that it would wind down its Arbitrum governance role. This move highlights how DAO-run firms are changing their governance models.

In a statement on the 1st of June, the firm billed the move as a realignment and not a bet against the Layer 2 (L2) chain. 

Stepping back from active delegation is, for Blockworks, a way to align with the current business goals of our organization, and should not be read as a lack of appreciation for Arbitrum nor a bet against the Arbitrum DAO itself.

Blockworks said it believes the DAO has a ‘bright future’ and urged delegators to seek active contributors as alternatives. 

DAO’s shifting landscape

DAOs represent community token holders and vote on proposals affecting the chain. Token holders can choose the preferred DAO delegate to voice their concerns.

Currently, Blockworks is the second-largest Arbitrum delegate after Entropy Advisors. 

Why are DAOs facing pressure?

Historically, DAOs were part of the three-layered approach for blockchains. Notably, the Labs companies raise capital and build the network. Aave Labs for Aave or Offchain Labs for Arbitrum are examples of these Lab companies. 

The Foundation acts as the legal bridge between the chain and the rest of the world. It funds operations from the treasury reserve, dominated by the chain’s native tokens. That’s where Aribitrum Foundation falls in. 

Finally, the DAO or governors decide how the treasury is speto be nt to improve the network. This was the best way to avoid regulatory issues and claim “decentralized.”

But the Aave-DAO governance conflict showed how the three-layered approach is losing its relevance.

Labs or the original chain builders now want more say and control in the chain. The spat has forced a key Aave DAO delegate and builders to quit the protocol, driving losses to AAVE token holders. 

One of the reasons for the changes is increased regulatory clarity. Several Biden-era enforcement actions by the SEC have been dropped.

Besides, the CLARITY Act has clear rules for a ‘mature blockchain’ and treatment of DAOs. 

In fact, a recent European Central Bank (ECB) study found that most DeFi DAOs aren’t as decentralized as they claim, noting that few voters control upto 96% of delegated power. 

Joseph Axisa, a specialist in legal advisory and managing partner at Axis Group, echoed these changes and noted, 

As DAOs continue to die (get killed by Labs Co’s), this is a decision that will become more common amongst several professional delegates.

Blockworks Arbitrum
Source: X

Following the update, ARB dropped 6%, which was partly accelerated by Bitcoin’s extended pullback. 


Final Summary

  • Blockworks will wind down its Arbitrum governance role and urged its current delegates to look for alternative DAO delegators. 
  • The move is part of a broader shift amid increased tension between DAOs and Labs, the original developers of the chains. 

 



Source link

Franklin Templeton is teaming up with MoonPay to let big investors swap stablecoins for yields 24/7

0
Franklin Templeton is teaming up with MoonPay to let big investors swap stablecoins for yields 24/7

Franklin Templeton is expanding its digital asset strategy through a new partnership with MoonPay that will allow institutional investors to move between stablecoins and the asset manager’s tokenized money market fund through an onchain workflow.

The integration connects Franklin Templeton’s Benji Technology Platform with MoonPay Trade’s infrastructure, creating a pathway for eligible institutions to exchange supported stablecoins for exposure to the firm’s tokenized money market fund and back again without leaving blockchain networks.

The partnership comes as Franklin Templeton pushes deeper into digital assets. In April, the $1.74 trillion asset manager announced plans to launch Franklin Crypto, a dedicated cryptocurrency division anchored by the acquisition of crypto investment firm 250 Digital. The new unit will focus on active crypto investment strategies, while Franklin Templeton continues building tokenized versions of traditional financial products.

Sandy Kaul, Franklin Templeton’s head of innovation and digital assets, said the company sees 2026 as “the year of the universal liquidity layer,” where stablecoins, tokenized funds and other forms of digital money become interoperable and can be used across trading, lending and collateral applications.

Kaul said one of the most compelling use cases for institutions is the ability to move stablecoin balances into tokenized money market funds and earn yield around the clock.

“We trade 24/7 in the crypto markets,” she said in an interview with CoinDesk. Unlike traditional money market funds, which typically require investors to hold positions through the end of a trading day to receive interest, tokenized funds can distribute yield based on the precise period an investor holds the asset, she said.

According to Kaul, institutional demand for that functionality has been strong.

“We had tremendous demand for this,” she said, referring to the ability to move between stablecoins and tokenized money market funds at any time while maintaining exposure to yield-generating assets.

The partnership also reflects MoonPay’s expansion beyond crypto trading and payments into tokenized real-world assets, an area attracting growing interest from traditional financial institutions seeking to bring regulated investment products onchain.



Source link

South Africa’s Tiger to sell chocolate brand Beacon

0
South Africa’s Tiger to sell chocolate brand Beacon


South Africa-based FMCG group Tiger Brands has struck a deal to sell its Beacon chocolate brand.

The transaction is Tiger’s latest disposal in the chocolate sector.

In November, the group announced plans to offload Cameroonian subsidiary Chocolaterie Confiserie Camerounaise, a business also known as Chococam. That deal remains subject to competition approval.

Reporting its half-year results yesterday (1 June), Tiger said it had signed an agreement to sell “the Beacon brand and associated equipment for the chocolate slabs, Easter eggs and assortments”.

Just Food has approached Tiger for more details on the deal, including the identity of the buyer.

In its stock-exchange filing, the company said it had booked a R92m ($5.7m) impairment relating to the Beacon transaction.

However, Tiger said the charge will be “negated” by the end of the financial year on the back of the profit the company expects to make.

The group underlined it will keep its chocolate brands TV Bar, Nosh, Wonder Bar Black Cat and Jelly Tots, as well its Jungle energy bar brand. It described the brands as “profitable” and a “strategic enabler of our snackification growth platform”.

In the six months to the end of March, Tiger brought in revenue of R17.9bn, up 1.3% on a year earlier. Volumes increased 2.6%. Like-for-like volumes rose 4.5%, Tiger said.

Operating income before “impairments, fair value losses and non-operational items” grew 26.1% to R2.1bn. Headline earnings per share – a closely-watched metric in South Africa – climbed 6.5% to 1,001 cents per share.

“The consumer environment remained competitive for the first half, with continued value-seeking behaviour driving purchasing patterns. The ripple effects of geopolitical uncertainty are expected to be felt more acutely in the second half, not only impacting the supply chain but also consumer disposable income,” Tiger said.

“South Africa’s Tiger to sell chocolate brand Beacon” was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand.

 


The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.



Source link