Home Blog Page 21

‘The Boroughs’ Star Has No Idea Why Netflix Cancelled The Hit Show

0
‘The Boroughs’ Star Has No Idea Why Netflix Cancelled The Hit Show


It’s not every day you see Netflix cancel a series with solid viewership and something as high as a 97% Rotten Tomatoes score. But that’s what’s happened with The Boroughs, which only just fell off the service’s top 10 list as recently as this past week, almost a month after its debut.

The Boroughs had legs, and everyone seems confused about what happened here, including one of its main stars, Geena Davis. She spoke to THR about the show ending after one season, even though it was assumed it would return, a season 2 writers’ room already in motion, and a three-season plan for the series. Here’s what she said when asked if she knew why:

“Fortunately, the creators, who became our dear, dear friends, were able to tell us before the news came out, and we’re all terribly disappointed. Honestly, I don’t know what happened. I think it’s probably rare for a show to not get picked up and to have it announced that it’s not being picked up while it’s still in the top 10. We didn’t expect that.”

She goes on to say that the showrunners were told to format the show so it wouldn’t end on a huge cliffhanger, given the frequent risk that Netflix might not renew a show, no matter how it performed, and that was true here. They did listen, as The Boroughs’ first season storyline did end somewhat conclusively, although there was a tease of what might be to come. But it won’t come.

THR has previously published an unconfirmed report that the cancellation was meant to be a dig at The Boroughs’ producers, the Duffer Brothers, who are leaving Netflix after the end of Stranger Things for Paramount, though that remains a rumor. Davis was asked whether she’d heard the show might be picked up by Paramount after their movie there, but she had no information on that front. She’d do it, of course, she relayed.

The Boroughs’ cancellation is indeed one of the strangest Netflix axings in quite a while, between its high review scores backed by a weeks-long spot in its top 10. The show may be pretty costly, given that it does use some measure of VFX due to its villainous-ish monsters, but the whole thing seems a bit unusual.

Is The Boroughs yet another Netflix show not even worth starting because it was canceled too soon? I’d argue no, given that the creators did follow that advice about making season 1 feel like a complete whole. It’s a bummer it’s not returning, but I’m not super broken up about it, given that it works as a one-and-done. I also think that 97% critic score is more than a bit inflated. But it’s good! And probably deserved better than this very weird cancellation.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.





Source link

Baby Boomers Have $525,000 Saved for Retirement. They Need $1.6 Million.

0
Baby Boomers Have $525,000 Saved for Retirement. They Need $1.6 Million.


Quick Read

  • Boomers average $525,000 saved but face a $1 million shortfall against the $1.6 million retirement target Americans say they need.

  • Gen X averages $215,600 in 401(k) savings while 26% carry outstanding 401(k) loans, draining their already short runway to retirement.

  • Social Security replaces just 40% of pre-retirement income, forcing most Gen X households to work longer, save harder, or accept a diminished retirement.

  • A recent study identified one single habit that doubled Americans’ retirement savings and moved retirement from dream, to reality. Read more here.

The headline number for Baby Boomers looks substantial. Fidelity’s most recent retirement analysis pegs the average Boomer 401(k) balance at $267,900, with a companion average IRA balance of $257,002. Add them together, and the typical Boomer in Fidelity’s universe is sitting on roughly half a million dollars across tax-advantaged accounts. That sounds like real retirement money. Set against what Americans say they actually need, it is not.

AleksandarNakic / Getty Images

Schwab’s 2025 participant survey put the retirement “magic number” at $1.6 million, and Northwestern Mutual’s separate study estimated Gen X specifically needs $1.57 million to retire comfortably. The gap between what Boomers have saved and what survey respondents say they need runs to roughly $1 million per household. That gap widens when you move one generation down.

Gen X Has Less, With Less Time to Fix It

Gen X workers have an average 401(k) balance of $215,600. The shortfall versus Boomers is meaningful. Gen X is the cohort closest to retirement that still has a runway, and that runway is short. Schwab’s data shows the expected retirement age is 66 for Gen X, leaving roughly a decade to close a gap that took thirty years to open. Compounding this, 25.9% of Gen X participants have a 401(k) loan outstanding, significantly higher than the 19.5% average across all generations.

Borrowing against retirement balances during peak earning years explains why a generation often called the sandwich cohort, supporting both aging parents and adult children, is struggling to keep pace.

Read: Data Shows One Habit Doubles American’s Savings And Boosts Retirement

Most Americans drastically underestimate how much they need to retire and overestimate how prepared they are. But data shows that people with one habit have more than double the savings of those who don’t.

The Median Tells a Harsher Story

Averages get pulled up by a small number of large balances. Transamerica’s survey, which captures broader household savings rather than just active 401(k) participants, found median household retirement savings of $270,000 for Boomers and just $77,000 for Gen X women. If 10 people have $50,000 each and one walks in with $2 million, the median stays at $50,000 while the mean jumps above $200,000. That is roughly what is happening here. The typical Gen X household is nowhere near the Fidelity active-participant average, because the Fidelity number excludes everyone without a workplace plan.

What Social Security Actually Covers

The standard fallback is Social Security. The 2026 COLA was set at 2.8%, but the underlying replacement math has not changed: the average retired worker receives about 40% of preretirement income from Social Security. With 40% replacement, the majority of spending will be funded from savings. Applying a 4% withdrawal rule to the average Boomer 401(k) balance produces only a fraction of that gap, leaving a structural shortfall against typical household spending.

The Macro Backdrop Is Deteriorating

The macro picture is not helping either cohort catch up. The personal savings rate fell to 3.7% in Q1 2026, and consumer sentiment dropped to 49.8 in April 2026, deep in pessimistic territory. While nominal hourly earnings reached $37.53 in May 2026, inflation has eroded those gains. Real average hourly earnings have actually decreased 0.7% over the past year. This means purchasing power has essentially flatlined during what should be Gen X’s peak saving years.

The Bottom Line

Boomers have more saved than Gen X, but both groups are short of the targets identified in their own surveys. According to the 2026 Northwestern Mutual Planning & Progress Study, the average American’s magic number to retire comfortably has climbed to $1.46 million, a 15% increase since 2025. Boomers benefit from longer compounding and lower loan utilization.

Gen X has less saved, more debt against their retirement accounts, a shorter runway, and a significantly higher self-reported financial target to hit. For most Gen X households, the math suggests working longer, saving more aggressively, or accepting a lower standard of living in retirement are the only remaining variables.

Data Shows One Habit Doubles American’s Savings And Boosts Retirement

Most Americans drastically underestimate how much they need to retire and overestimate how prepared they are. But data shows that people with one habit have more than double the savings of those who don’t.

And no, it’s got nothing to do with increasing your income, savings, clipping coupons, or even cutting back on your lifestyle. It’s much more straightforward (and powerful) than any of that. Frankly, it’s shocking more people don’t adopt the habit given how easy it is.



Source link

Bitcoin institutional demand lags – Can adoption sustain BTC’s recovery?

0
Bitcoin institutional demand lags - Can adoption sustain BTC's recovery?


Bitcoin’s network activity is improving even as its price remains below its previous highs.

In 2024, the network activity moved in tandem with the price action as Bitcoin [BTC] moved toward the $100,000 zone. However, in 2025, this relationship began to diverge when the network activity plummeted rapidly.

Source: CryptoQuant

The divergence suggests Bitcoin adoption continues strengthening beneath the surface, even as investors remain cautious about the price outlook. Recently, however, the trend has reversed.

The metric’s index rose from nearly 3.2k to nearly 3.8k as Bitcoin lost its upward momentum. That shift matters because growing usage is appearing before a major price recovery.

That said, caution is still warranted. According to CryptoQuant, most of the increases have been as a result of smaller transaction volumes compared to institutional inflows.

Fund demand weakens despite improving network activity

While there are indicators that network activity is recovering, fund demand continues to be headed in the exact opposite direction. Recently, the Fund Market Premium fell into negative territory as Bitcoin moved down toward $63.1k.

This indicates that institutions and investors are still unwilling to pay more than Net Asset Value (NAV) for exposure. Earlier in the cycle, the Premium was close to neutral while Bitcoin was trading above $100k.

Source: CryptoQuant

However, fund demand gradually weakened, pushing the premium to approximately -6 during the recent selloff. Though the metric has recovered back up to approximately -0.6, it remains in negative territory.

Additionally, the 30 Day EMA is continuing to trend downward. This divergence implies that although adoption may be improving under the hood, stronger capital inflows are yet to provide support for a sustained recovery.

Despite improving network activity and reduced demand, the current dolphin accumulation adds an additional layer of caution. The addresses with balances from 100 to 1k BTC have been accumulating more Bitcoin over time than they did one year prior.

 However, the rate at which these balances are increasing is declining steadily. As a result of this decline, the net increase in dolphin (addresses holding between 100 and 1k) balances has dropped significantly since the beginning of the year.

Source: CryptoQuant

Although dolphin balances continue to be positive, the loss of momentum within this segment of the market indicates that some level of investor confidence has waned.

Therefore, while there appears evidence of conviction among investors based upon continued positive net increases in dolphin balances relative to last year’s totals, the rates at which these increases have occurred indicate weakened conviction.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin network usage continues improving, yet weaker fund demand suggests adoption is still outpacing capital inflows.
  • Dolphin Holdings remains above last year’s levels, though slowing accumulation points to weaker conviction.



Source link

A look at how falling Bitcoin prices, capital structure changes pushed STRC below $83 in just five weeks.

0
Michael Saylor says Mnav is just one metric as Strategy dilution debate continues

May 26: The company confirmed it had used its cash reserve to finance the bond repurchase. The transaction had reduced the fund to $871 million.

The buyback reduced that reserve to roughly six months of STRC dividend coverage. The company had previously said the plan was to maintain about 24 months of dividend coverage.

STRC traded at $99.33, bitcoin hovered around $77,000.

June 1: Strategy sold 32 BTC, its first bitcoin sale since 2022. The move appeared intended to demonstrate that the company was willing and able to sell the token if necessary to fund dividend obligations.

The sale accounted for just 0.0038% of the company’s holdings. Nevertheless, the company’s common stock (MSTR) dropped 5.9% and bitcoin fell to as low as $70,500 before closing at $71,286. STRC closed at $98.07.

June 5: Bitcoin fell below $60,000 for the first time since October 2024, closing around $61,000, according to CoinDesk data. STRC dropped to as low as $90 to end the day at $93.40.

June 8: Strategy shareholders approve the plan to pay STRC dividends twice a month. Strategy bought 1,550 BTC and said the balance of its dollar reserve had risen to $1 billion.

June 15: Strategy bought another 1,587 BTC and said the balance of its dollar reserve was now $1.1 billion.



Source link

Economists say the Fed committee will ‘act as a brake’ on Kevin Warsh’s ‘regime change’. Investors take heed

0
Economists say the Fed committee will ‘act as a brake’ on Kevin Warsh’s ‘regime change’. Investors take heed


Kevin Warsh has wasted no time making his mark on the Federal Reserve. In his first meeting as chairman, the new Fed chief held rates steady but signaled sweeping changes to the way America’s central bank operates.

Warsh made his first appearance as chairman on June 17, when the central bank announced it would hold rates steady for the fourth consecutive meeting, leaving the benchmark lending rate between 3.5% to 3.75% (1). During the press conference, Warsh also announced the creation of new task forces dedicated to “each of five areas that are central to the broad conduct of monetary policy.”

Must Read

Perhaps most significant, though, was his decision to withhold any projections. The Fed released its standard dot plot, where 19 central bank policymakers can offer their forecasts anonymously. It did not include Warsh’s projection.

Warsh has publicly criticized the dot plot in the past, saying the Fed should provide less guidance and communication on where interest rates may go.

“Stop talking so much,” he advised the Fed last year. (2) “More thinking, less talking.”

The chair has long argued that the Fed should limit its communication with the public, saying the markets fixate on the central bank’s forecasts and should instead be left to do more of the heavy lifting.

“I think financial markets perform best when they react to incoming data,” Warsh said. “I think financial markets work less efficiently when they ask a question, ‘How will the Federal Reserve react to that incoming information?'”

The future of the Fed

While Warsh appears keen to enact change, he will have to appeal to the Federal Open Market Committee’s 12 members, who also vote on significant moves.

“The other members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will likely act as a brake on any quick shift in monetary policy under Warsh,” Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at J.P. Morgan, said in a statement. (3)

Feroli added that changes to analysis, like the dot plot, would require a vote from the committee. Though he said he believes the plot is favored by many on the FOMC, despite mixed reviews from the public.

The chief economist also said Warsh’s dovish stance on the economy is at odds with America’s economic outlook and that he’d need to build consensus among other committee members, many of whom are more hawkish.

Read More: About 1 in 5 Americans over 50 has zero retirement savings. Here’s why it’s not too late

What it means for investors

Markets are still navigating what the Warsh era will look like. Following June 17’s meeting, stocks fell, short-term bond yields rose, and the U.S. dollar strengthened.

“Markets will have to get used to a difficult transition to the new Fed era,” Krishna Guha, vice chairman at Evercore ISI, said in a note. (4)

Warsh says financial markets should act on their own when reading the economy, rather than trying to anticipate how the bank will act. (5) The statement from the Fed and the subsequent press conference were both much shorter than usual. Warsh has also hinted at fewer news conferences in the future.

The immediate market reaction suggests investors are responding to this shift. The changing of the guard could continue to trigger fractious markets as traders learn what impact Warsh’s leadership will have and what his view on inflation, the economy and the bank’s role will lead to.

For investors, this could be a time of uncertainty, but experts are warning against any drastic moves.

“Diversification has been the best antidote to volatility so far in 2026, and we believe that will continue as investors position themselves for uncertainty for the path of rates moving forward,” Phil Camporeale, J.P. Morgan chief investment strategist, said in a statement. (6)

It’s important to avoid dramatic reallocations or panic selling. However, investors should be prepared for the possibility of increased market volatility, as Wall Street adjusts to the changes. Favoring companies that are consistently profitable and limiting exposure to stocks particularly sensitive to interest rates can help protect investments.

The possible volatility also means high-quality stocks could trade at a discount if the markets overreact to the Fed’s moves.

You May Also Like

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

U.S. Federal Reserve (1); The Wall Street Journal (2); JPMorgan Chase (3); NBC News (4); CNN (5); Chase (6)

This article originally appeared on Moneywise.com under the title: Economists say the Fed committee will ‘act as a brake’ on Kevin Warsh’s ‘regime change’. Investors take heed

This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.



Source link

ENS eyes rebound from demand zone – But bearish signals persist

0
ENS eyes rebound from demand zone - But bearish signals persist


Ethereum Name Service [ENS] has trended lower over the past 24 hours as bearish sentiment and sustained selling pressure dragged the asset down across the market.

The token, which shed 12% within the period, now points to the possibility of a further decline ahead — though its structural setup still leaves room for a major rebound in the near term.

ENS slides into key demand zone

Market analysis shows that ENS’ decline has pushed the asset into a key demand zone, the final cushion separating it from its recent low of $4.28, which it set on the 6th of June.

The demand zone has historically drawn positive reactions at this level, hinting at a possible relief pump. Currently, the 4-hour chart points to a green candle forming at the zone, a sign that bullish demand is building.

ENS price action
Source: TradingView

At the time of analysis, the demand zone holds clear upside targets. If buyers respect it, ENS could rally toward the nearest target at $5.06 and the upper target at $5.82.

If sellers keep control, ENS risks swinging lower and extending its slide toward a fresh low, as it did earlier this month.

Indicators point to further ENS pressure

The Bollinger Bands, which gauge whether an asset is trading at overextended highs or lows relative to its recent range, show ENS reaching the mid-band, a level that has since flipped into resistance.

A rejection off this mid-band typically forces the asset toward the lower band, in this case sitting at roughly $4.32 — slightly above the lower price target.

ENS price indicator.ENS price indicator.
Source: TradingView

The Moving Average Ribbon, which combines the 20, 50, 100 and 200 SMAs, shows a crossover that reinforces the bearish move. At the time of writing, the SMA 50 had just crossed below the SMA 100, a classic bearish signal.

The SMA 200 also remains elevated well above the other averages while the SMA 50 sits at the lowest level, a configuration that confirms the bearish setup.

Together, even with the demand zone in play, ENS could drop further toward either the lower Bollinger Band or its previous low before staging a rebound.

ENS Spot netflow signals accumulation

CoinGlass’ Spot netflow data for ENS shows investors buying far more of the asset than they have sold across the market.

The netflow registered roughly $2.3 million more in buying than selling, the widest accumulation gap recorded for the asset to date.

The reading tracks how much ENS investors have moved off cryptocurrency exchanges and into private wallets, a pattern that often signals bullish, longer-term conviction and supports a higher trend.

If the netflow keeps favouring buyers, ENS stands a strong chance of holding its ground and resisting a deeper decline.


Final Summary

  • After a 12% drop, ENS has fallen to a price level where buyers have stepped in before, raising hopes of a short-term bounce toward $5.06 to $5.82.
  • Momentum still favours sellers, so ENS could slip to a fresh low near $4.28 before any meaningful recovery takes hold.



Source link