Home Blog

Why Hyperliquid’s 17% price drop puts HYPE’s $69 support at risk

0
Why Hyperliquid's 17% price drop puts HYPE's $69 support at risk


Over the last week, Hyperliquid [HYPE] has dropped 17%, trading at $72.49 as of writing. Despite bullish exchange listings on South Korea’s Upbit and Bithumb on the 10th of November, the token has struggled to regain ground after falling below $87-$89. The latest price action suggests that sellers have continued to dictate the direction of the market.

At the same time, selling pressure has been rising from several directions. On the 31st of October, two large HYPE holders sold $109 million in tokens after Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) released a more relaxed regulatory statement about perpetual Futures.

Then, on the 8th of November, Binance reopened HYPE withdrawals, giving holders access to their tokens again after the exchange’s security breach in October.

HYPE’s weekly retracement puts $69 in focus

HYPE’s weekly chart has remained under pressure over the past seven days, with price breaking below the 50% Fibonacci level and moving into the 61.8% retracement zone. At the time of writing, HYPE was trading around $72.49 and had officially entered the golden pocket.

The indicators also pointed to the market cooling as the weekly RSI stood at 51.07 and continued to trend lower, suggesting that the bullish momentum seen in previous months was beginning to fade.

Furthermore, OBV had declined from its August-September highs, clearly displaying the difficulty buyers had faced in matching the volume behind recent selling.

Can daily buyers prevent another leg lower?

The daily chart also offered very little evidence of a reversal happening anytime soon. HYPE remained below the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement and is hovering close to its recent swing low at $70.44. An RSI of 35.35 pointed towards continued bearish momentum.

On the other hand, OBV’s recent uptick suggested that buyers’ interest had peaked; however, sustained buying would be needed for price to have any meaningful recovery.

A break below $70.44 could shift attention towards the weekly $69.03 retracement. If buyers defend this area, some relief could be seen, potentially giving HYPE room to attempt a recovery. However, if this support gives way, the next downside target sits at the weekly Fibonacci level of $61.16.


Final Summary

  • HYPE’s weekly and daily charts show weakening momentum, with sellers continuing to hold the upper hand.
  • The $69.03 Fibonacci level is the next major support to watch. A successful defence of this level could open the door to a recovery attempt, while a breakdown risks further losses towards $61.16.

 

 



Source link

83-Year-Old Former Ironman Athlete Shares 3 Lessons on Healthy Aging

0
83-Year-Old Former Ironman Athlete Shares 3 Lessons on Healthy Aging


Having competed in multiple triathlons, marathons, and Ironman races, one might think that Edwina Brocklesby, 83, known as Eddie, had been an athlete her entire life.

However, she only started running at 50 years old and took up swimming even later. After her husband died in 1994 following a short illness, staying active took on a new importance for her.

“There was an element of keep going, keep active — and I have,” Brocklesby told Business Insider.

Two years after his death, she ran her first London Marathon, and five years later, at 58, competed in her first triathlon.

Brocklesby completed her first Ironman in 2009 at age 65, swimming, cycling, and running a total of 140.6 miles across the Spanish island of Lanzarote. She went on to complete five more, including Ironman Vichy in 2015, becoming Britain’s oldest woman to complete the triathlon at 72. She beat her record completing the Ironman Cozumel in 2017 at age 74.

Brocklesby has also found a charity, Silverfit, that promotes active, happier aging. When Business Insider met Brocklesby in London, she was still monitoring her health after a serious injury last year, but that hadn’t dampened her enthusiasm for exercise. That evening, she had planned to join her running club.

“Contrary to most beliefs, it’s never too late to take the opportunity to get fitter,” she said. “I think there has been a misconception about 50-plus not being suitable, whereas I think it’s almost the reverse of that.”

Making exercise fun and social has kept her going

Brocklesby believes one word is often overlooked in discussions about fitness motivation: Fun.

She recalls giving a lecture at a conference, being the first to mention the need for fun, and receiving a standing ovation for it.

“So, I think it’s not used enough,” Brocklesby said. “Because I found the activities that I do to be fun and sociable, I think that’s the key factor [to staying active],” she added.


Smiling participant stands behind a Vitality parkrun Bushy Park sign near a lake and trees.

Brocklesby is a big fan of the community event parkrun. 

Courtesy of Edwina Brocklesby



At 56, she joined Serpentine Running and Triathlon Club, which she said has been vital to her fitness journey and a source of many friendships. In 2008, 2010, and 2019, she competed in Race Across America as part of a four-woman team with fellow Serpentine members.

“I think [group exercise] is giving you a purpose, you know, to get out in the morning and do something, particularly with other people,” Brocklesby said. “It’s the social element that gets people out of an isolating lifestyle when they’re living at home on their own.”

With the internet and AI, Brocklesby believes finding local fitness clubs for older adults is easier now than it was when she first started. She recommends that older adults reach out to family or neighbors for help finding activities online.

Staying active means adapting when circumstances change

Brocklesby is no stranger to adapting.

Throughout her years as an endurance athlete, she’s suffered from injuries and underwent hip replacement surgery in 2021. She said that in September 2025, someone using a walker fell backward onto her, fracturing her left leg and arm, and that she hadn’t yet cycled outdoors again.

“I think it is distressing,” Brocklesby said. “You do have to come to terms with the difference.”


Cyclist wearing a helmet stands with a road bike beside a wooden bench in a sunny park.

Brocklesby said she misses outdoor cycling. 

Courtesy of Edwina Brocklesby



Since the injury, she has adapted her exercise routine with her coach’s help. While she still exercises for 20 to 23 hours a week, her routine includes low-impact workouts such as walking, Zwift-based indoor cycling, strength training, Pilates, and swimming.

Brocklesby’s belief in the importance of socializing has extended to her recovery, too. During her recovery, she stayed at Loveday, a residential senior care and rehabilitation facility that operates The 1150 Club, a post-operative rehabilitation facility, which enabled her to recover around others.

“The social element there was really vital,” Brocklesby said. “It is motivational.”

Healthy aging doesn’t have to mean optimizing everything

Self-optimization — the idea that every aspect of one’s life should be tracked in pursuit of better health — has become a prominent theme in wellness and fitness circles, especially on social media.

British entrepreneur Steven Bartlett, for example, went viral for saying that having three glasses of wine one night heavily affected his performance for the next few days.

When asked about what she thinks of the self-optimization trend, Brocklesby laughed and said: “I think if that was the theory, I’ve failed dramatically because I very often have one glass of wine at night.”


Smiling person in a red SERPENTINE shirt takes a waterfront selfie on a wooden dock near apartment buildings.

Brocklesby in her Serpentine running kit. 

Courtesy of Edwina Brocklesby



Nonetheless, she said she usually sleeps well, is not overly concerned about whether the score is consistently good or excellent, and eats “relatively healthily.”

Brocklesby said she focuses on incorporating protein in her diet. While she said she doesn’t eat a lot of meat, she eats an egg every morning and includes lots of fish and vegetables in her meals.

Brocklesby may no longer be running long distances, but she hasn’t stopped setting goals. She’s considering taking part in the 2027 London Marathon, provided she can walk the course without requiring volunteers to work longer than necessary.





Source link

$1.04B out of Bitcoin ETFs – Short term holders plunge into net unrealized losses

0
$1.04B out of Bitcoin ETFs - Short term holders plunge into net unrealized losses


Bitcoin [BTC] spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) flows measured -$1.043B in the past three trading days, from the 5th to the 9th of November. The heavy selling saw Bitcoin slip below its 50-week moving average, which is now at $75.2K.

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index showed a fearful reading of 26. Over the past six weeks, Bitcoin miner MARA Holdings sold 13,597 Bitcoin at an average of $81,039 per coin, bringing in $1.1B to fund its pivot towards AI data centers.

Heavy liquidations further fueled pessimistic market expectations. According to Glassnode, Hyperliquid trading volume for equities surpassed Bitcoin trading volume as traders rushed to buy the stock market dip.

Short-term holder losses increase, and exchange inflows decline

Source: CryptoQuant

The Bitcoin short-term holder Spent Output Profit Loss (SOPR) was at 0.99. Readings below 1 signal that selling at a loss is dominant.

Analyst MAC_D also used the Bitcoin Short-term Holder P&L to Exchanges indicator to examine BTC held at a loss. On the 6th of November, 32,695 BTC held at a loss by short-term holders flowed into exchanges.

This accounted for 89% of the total short-term holder exchange inflows.

On the 9th of November, the STH inflows at a loss to exchanges dropped to 9,900 BTC, even though the price fell from $75.7k to $74.8k.

In a post on CryptoQuant, the analyst wrote that declining sell pressure following increased loss realization has, historically, indicated a potential price rebound to the upside.

Bitcoin risk-reward is improving in the price slide

Bitcoin Adjusted NUPLBitcoin Adjusted NUPL
Source: CryptoQuant

The Bitcoin pullback has removed the short-term holders’ profit cushion, wrote crypto analyst DV Moreno. The STH MVRV was below 1, and the short-term holder NUPL slipped below zero, though unrealized losses were shallower than in February or June earlier this year.

Bitcoin Short Term Sharpe RatioBitcoin Short Term Sharpe Ratio
Source: CryptoQuant

The short-term Sharpe ratio dipped into negative territory, a sign of weak returns relative to the recent volatility.

Earlier this month, Bitcoin rallied above $80k briefly before it came under heavy selling pressure. This rejection highlighted why the bear case is still relevant.

If the net unrealized losses deepen and Bitcoin prices drop below $73k, it would strengthen the bear-market continuation argument, according to the analyst.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin market participants have multiple reasons to be bearish, such as heavy liquidations, ETF flows, and institutional holders selling.
  • Some signs, such as the STH P&L to exchange metric, signaled easing sell pressure and a potential rebound, but the bearish case is still relevant.



Source link

Silicon Valley Doesn’t Have a Monopoly on Startup Wisdom

0
Silicon Valley Doesn’t Have a Monopoly on Startup Wisdom


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Founders in small ecosystems design for international markets from day one, planning for localization, payments and regulation before they need to.
  • Scarcity forces discipline as founders who learn to operate lean and treat relationships as infrastructure are better prepared for market corrections and fundraising delays.
  • Local knowledge is a competitive advantage.

Silicon Valley teaches founders to think big. Smaller startup markets teach them how to build when almost nothing is guaranteed.

Over the past year, I have met founders and investors across the Baltics, Georgia and Guatemala through Baltic Fintech Days, a 500 Global Eurasia Demo Day in Tbilisi and Volcano Summit. These ecosystems differ in language, history and access to capital, but the strongest founders shared a common advantage: They could not rely on a large domestic market, abundant venture funding or proximity to the world’s most powerful networks.

That constraint shaped how they built. They thought internationally earlier, stretched resources further and cultivated relationships across borders. As capital becomes more selective and growth at all costs continues to fall out of favor, founders everywhere can learn from companies built in markets that have never had the luxury of excess.

Here are five lessons from some of the world’s smallest startup ecosystems.

1. Build for the world from day one

A founder in the United States can build a large company without ever leaving the domestic market. Founders in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Georgia or Guatemala rarely have that option.

The entire population of Lithuania is smaller than that of Los Angeles. Latvia has fewer than 2 million residents, while Georgia has fewer than 4 million. Even Guatemala, the largest of the markets I visited, represents only a fraction of the purchasing power available in the United States.

As a result, international expansion is not a distant ambition for many of these founders. It is part of the original business model.

At Baltic Fintech Days, I met entrepreneurs who were thinking about cross-border payments, compliance and market entry well before reaching the scale at which an American startup might begin considering international growth. Their home markets gave them useful places to test, but not enough room to stop there.

This forces founders to ask important questions early: Can the product travel? Can it serve customers across languages, currencies and regulatory systems? Does the problem exist beyond the founder’s immediate network?

Building globally does not mean launching in 10 countries at once. It means avoiding assumptions that make international expansion unnecessarily difficult later. Founders should consider localization, payment infrastructure, regulation and cross-border distribution while the company is still young enough to adapt.

2. Treat constraints as a design advantage

Founders love to talk about resourcefulness, but the concept takes on a different meaning in ecosystems where capital, talent and customers are all more difficult to access.

At 500 Global’s Eurasia Demo Day in Tbilisi, I saw companies working to gain attention far beyond their immediate geography. They could not assume that investors would already understand their markets, recognize their universities or trust their local references. They had to communicate the problem, the opportunity and their credibility with unusual precision.

That constraint can produce better companies.

When capital is scarce, founders have less room for performative hiring, unnecessary tools or growth that cannot be tied to customer demand. They learn to test assumptions quickly, sell before everything is perfect and use partnerships to extend their reach.

Founders in major technology hubs should apply the same discipline even when more resources are available. Ask what the company would prioritize if it had half the budget, half the team and half the time. The answer often reveals which initiatives are truly essential.

Scarcity is painful, but it can also create focus. A company that learns to operate efficiently before raising significant capital may be better prepared to survive market corrections, fundraising delays and unexpected competition.

3. Make your ecosystem part of your competitive advantage

Smaller markets are often discussed only in terms of what they lack. That framing overlooks what they can offer.

The Baltics have developed deep expertise in fintech, digital infrastructure and cross-border business. Georgia sits at the intersection of Europe and Asia and is developing a generation of founders accustomed to navigating multiple markets. Guatemala offers access to Central America, proximity to the United States and entrepreneurs with firsthand knowledge of industries and consumers that remain poorly understood by many global investors.

At Volcano Summit in Guatemala, the value of the ecosystem was not simply that it brought international investors into the country. It created a place where local and regional founders could build relationships without first relocating to San Francisco, Miami or New York.

Founders should resist the urge to erase where they come from in an attempt to appear more investable. Geography can be a source of differentiated insight.

A founder who understands regional payment behavior, informal commerce, remittances or local regulation may see an opportunity long before an outsider does. The goal is not to build a business that only works locally. It is to turn local knowledge into an advantage that can travel.

The most compelling question is not, “Why would a major company come from this market?” It is, “What can a founder see from this market that others cannot?”

4. Relationships are infrastructure

In mature startup hubs, founders can mistake proximity for access. They may attend dozens of events, collect hundreds of contacts and still fail to build relationships that materially help the company.

In smaller ecosystems, relationships often function as infrastructure.

One trusted introduction can connect a founder to a customer, investor or market that would otherwise be difficult to reach. Government agencies, accelerators, diaspora networks and local operators frequently play an outsized role in helping companies cross borders.

I saw versions of this at Baltic Fintech Days, through 500 Global’s network in Georgia and at Volcano Summit. These gatherings mattered because they connected local credibility with international reach. They reduced the distance between founders and people who could help them enter new markets.

Founders should approach relationship-building with the same discipline they apply to product development. Instead of asking how many people they met, they should ask whether they are building trust with the right customers, partners and advocates.

That also means becoming useful before asking for something. Founders can share market intelligence, make introductions and offer thoughtful feedback. In smaller ecosystems, reputations travel quickly. Generosity and reliability compound.

5. Learn to tell the market why it should care

A founder in a well-known ecosystem benefits from familiar signals. Investors recognize the schools, employers, accelerators and other funds around the table. Founders from less visible markets must often establish credibility without those shortcuts.

That makes storytelling a core business capability.

The strongest founders I encountered did not simply explain what their products did. They connected a local problem to a much larger shift. A payments challenge became a story about global commerce. A compliance product became infrastructure for the international workforce. A regional marketplace became evidence of changing consumer behavior across emerging economies.

Founders should not expect investors or customers to do this translation themselves.

A strong pitch should answer four questions: Why does this problem matter? Why is the opportunity larger than it first appears? Why is this team uniquely equipped to solve it? And why is now the right moment?

This is especially important for founders building outside established technology centers. Investors may incorrectly interpret an unfamiliar market as a small opportunity. The founder’s job is to distinguish the company’s starting point from its potential destination.

Great companies are not limited to great startup hubs

Talent is distributed far more evenly than capital, attention or access. Some of the world’s most ambitious founders are building in places that receive only a fraction of global venture investment.

The Baltics, Georgia and Guatemala are not interchangeable, nor should they be reduced to a single category of “emerging markets.” Each has its own strengths, challenges and history. What connects them is the resourcefulness required to build beyond the limits of a small domestic ecosystem.

Founders everywhere can learn from that mindset.

Start globally. Use constraints to sharpen your decisions. Turn local knowledge into an advantage. Treat relationships as infrastructure. And make the scale of your ambition impossible to misunderstand.

The next category-defining company may not come from the place investors visit most often. It may come from the market whose founders learned to build without waiting for the world to notice.

Key Takeaways

  • Founders in small ecosystems design for international markets from day one, planning for localization, payments and regulation before they need to.
  • Scarcity forces discipline as founders who learn to operate lean and treat relationships as infrastructure are better prepared for market corrections and fundraising delays.
  • Local knowledge is a competitive advantage.

Silicon Valley teaches founders to think big. Smaller startup markets teach them how to build when almost nothing is guaranteed.

Over the past year, I have met founders and investors across the Baltics, Georgia and Guatemala through Baltic Fintech Days, a 500 Global Eurasia Demo Day in Tbilisi and Volcano Summit. These ecosystems differ in language, history and access to capital, but the strongest founders shared a common advantage: They could not rely on a large domestic market, abundant venture funding or proximity to the world’s most powerful networks.

That constraint shaped how they built. They thought internationally earlier, stretched resources further and cultivated relationships across borders. As capital becomes more selective and growth at all costs continues to fall out of favor, founders everywhere can learn from companies built in markets that have never had the luxury of excess.



Source link

XRP’s $0.80 opportunity or zero-bound risk? Quantum upgrade divides investors!

0
XRP's $0.80 opportunity or zero-bound risk? Quantum upgrade divides investors!


A key risk management strategy is now coming into focus. 

On the surface, high risk-rewards mean that there is more upside than downside. However, in current market conditions, traders must ask themselves if they are willing to take on the risk for the potential gains. This makes Ripple’s latest move on XRPL timely.

In a recent announcement, the XRPL Foundation outlined a new quantum resistance roadmap that will see the entire network upgraded to ML-DSA-44 (NIST Approved Post-Quantum Digital Signature) by 2028.

XRPL
Source: XRPL Foundation

Under the proposal, account owners will be able to add a post-quantum public key to their accounts and deactivate their current signing keys. This would let XRPL accounts transition from traditional cryptographic signatures to a system designed to withstand potential attacks from future quantum computers.

In short, Ripple is pushing XRPL towards a more future-ready security model. As quantum computing threats become a greater concern, network security could become an increasingly important factor in investors’ long-term “risk-reward” assessment of XRP.

Notably, this is coming at an interesting time considering there is a lot of FUD in the market.

XRP certainly hasn’t been immune to this sell-off with $1 looking extremely vulnerable. So, does the long-term potential of XRPL’s quantum resistant upgrade justify the risk of holding Ripple [XRP] through the current downturn?

XRP faces a risk-reward test as quantum hopes clash with weak signals

The market is becoming increasingly divided on XRP.

Some investors see this as an opportunity to buy the dip, seeing levels like $0.80 as a potential lifetime opportunity. Moreover, on the long-term bullish side, the XRPL quantum resistance upgrade for Ripple is positive for holding XRP. Bears, however, are getting louder with the “XRP to zero” narrative taking hold.

This is what makes the chart below so important. According to SoSoValue, Spot XRP ETFs recorded their largest single-day net outflows of the year on 9th November. Over $10 million was withdrawn from the funds, the most seen in a day since 9th March, when outflows topped $18 million.

This alluded to increasing selling pressure and weaker institutional demand for XRP.

xrpxrp
Source: SoSoValue

Together, weakening sentiment and rising ETF outflows may be shifting the balance further in favour of bears.

This makes XRPL’s recent quantum-resistance upgrade less likely to improve XRP’s near-term risk-reward setup. With broader market FUD, weak technicals, and sustained ETF outflows adding to selling pressure, the downside risk remains significant.

As a result, the XRP-to-zero narrative cannot be easily dismissed, even with the network’s long-term security improvements.


Final Summary

  • XRPL plans to introduce quantum-resistant security by 2028, boosting its long-term outlook.

  • XRP faces growing selling pressure as ETF outflows top $10 million and bearish sentiment builds.

 

 



Source link

What next for Zcash after ZEC’s 15% fall overshadows Grayscale’s $1M promise?

0
What next for Zcash after ZEC's 15% fall overshadows Grayscale's $1M promise?


On Tuesday, 10th November, digital-asset-focused investment and asset management platform Grayscale announced the launch of Zcash [ZEC] Invest. It also committed $1 million to support the Zcash ecosystem.

Zcash Invest is a platform to educate investors and advisors about the ecosystem and the Zcash ETF. Funding for these initiatives will come entirely from the sponsor fee of the ETF, ZCSH, for up to its first year as an exchange-traded product.

The asset manager has also awarded $100,000 each to four groups. These include the Zcash Foundation Group, policy group Pretty Good Policy for ZCash, Shielded Labs, and Project Tachyon, the project aimed at scaling shielded transactions.

One of the biggest short-term crypto losers

At the time of writing, Zcash had fallen by 15.25% in the last 24 hours. As Bitcoin [BTC] maintained its descent below $74K, it kept the market-wide sentiment in fearful territory.

The leading privacy token was already facing high selling pressure, which was likely part of a higher timeframe corrective move. Even so, the short-term losses resulted in low speculative demand as Open Interest fell by 13.4% in 24 hours.

ZEC 1-week Chart
Source: ZEC/USDT on TradingView

The weekly chart had a bullish swing structure, but a bearish internal one. The local lows around $1,050 appeared to have been ceded. Technically, the weekly candle has not closed yet, which could be confirmation too.

Nevertheless, ZEC’s descent to $945 was part of a correction that could extend to $635 in the coming months.

The latter level was the mid-point of another imbalance further south, just above the 78.6% retracement level.

Watch out for a bounce back above $1,100

ZEC 4-hour ChartZEC 4-hour Chart
Source: ZEC/USDT on TradingView

The $1,049 and $1,368 levels were the anchor points for the previous swing structure of Zcash on the 4-hour chart. The swing low has been broken since, signaling a bearish trend shift.

A sustained downtrend below $900 would mean buyers were very weak, and a sizeable bounce might not come before further drawdown towards $635.

On the other hand, if the $945-demand zone is defended, at least for now, a bounce to $1,050 and $1,130 would become more likely. In such a scenario, swing traders can wait for such a bounce to sell.


Final Summary

  • Grayscale committed $1 million to non-profits and initiatives that support the Zcash ecosystem, and also launched ZCash Invest.
  • Zcash has faced intense selling pressure over the past week, ceding a key local level at $1,030.

 



Source link

David Ellison’s Skydance replaces DC Studios bosses James Gunn and Peter Safran with Marvel veteran

0
David Ellison's Skydance replaces DC Studios bosses James Gunn and Peter Safran with Marvel veteran

Skydance has removed James Gunn and Peter Safran as co-chairmen and co-CEOs of DC Studios, ending a four-year run that began with a hit Superman and was expected to survive the company’s takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Their replacement is Jeremy Latcham, a former Marvel Studios executive who helped launch the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Skydance Motion Picture Group announced the change on Nov. 9. Latcham starts Dec. 1 as president and chief creative officer of DC Studios, overseeing its film, television, and animation slate.

The move puts Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, and the rest of the DC Comics roster under new creative control barely a month after Skydance closed its deal. It also resets a franchise strategy that Warner Bros. has now restarted twice in 13 years.

A reprieve that lasted a month

Paramount completed its takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery on Oct. 6 and renamed the combined company Skydance. Early reports said Gunn and Safran would keep their jobs, even as Warner Bros. film chiefs Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy were expected to give way to Paramount’s Dana Goldberg and Josh Greenstein.

That assurance did not hold. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Skydance chairman and CEO David Ellison and co-CEO Ynon Kreiz visited Gunn and Safran’s office on Nov. 6 to deliver the news in person.

Gunn and Safran will still produce DC projects, and they are finishing post-production on Man of Tomorrow, the Superman sequel slated for July 2027. Latcham reports to Goldberg and Greenstein, now co-chairs of Skydance Motion Picture Group.

“I’ve had the privilege to help bring some of the most celebrated superhero stories to life on the big screen, and I’m excited and honored for the opportunity to now lead DC Studios into its next era,” Latcham said in a statement.

A $618 million start, then a flop

Gunn and Safran took over DC Studios on Nov. 1, 2022, hired to reboot the DC characters as a single connected universe. The deal came months after Discovery merged with WarnerMedia to form Warner Bros. Discovery.

Gunn arrived as a proven voice in the genre. He wrote and directed all three Guardians of the Galaxy films for Marvel, then made his DC debut with The Suicide Squad in 2021. Safran produced that film, other DC adaptations of the 2010s, and the Conjuring films for Warner Bros.’ New Line Cinema.

Their first release, Gunn’s Superman, opened to $217 million globally in July 2025 and finished with $618.7 million worldwide. It introduced David Corenswet as the Man of Steel and set up a wider universe of familiar DC characters.

The second did not soar. Supergirl cost a reported $170 million and became one of DC Studios’ worst opening-weekend flops this summer, grossing $126 million worldwide amid weak reviews.

The third paid off. Clayface, an R-rated body-horror film made for a reported $44 million, opened at No. 1 and had grossed $109 million worldwide as of Nov. 8. On television, the pair delivered a second season of Peacemaker, the animated Creature Commandos, and HBO’s Lanterns, a hit when it debuted in August.

Marvel’s playbook, 18 years later

Latcham was part of the founding team at Marvel Studios under Kevin Feige. He worked on Iron Man, The Avengers, and Tom Holland’s Spider-Man films, and he collaborated with Gunn on Guardians of the Galaxy.

He left Marvel in 2017 to found Latcham Pictures, whose films include Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves and Bad Times at the El Royale. DC is his return to superheroes.

The task he inherits has defeated Warner Bros. before. The studio’s first attempt at a Marvel-style connected universe, the DC Extended Universe, began with Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel in 2013 and ended with Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom in 2023, after Gunn and Safran had already been hired to start over.

In between came a decade of uneven results, from Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Wonder Woman to The Flash and Black Adam. Unlike Marvel’s tightly linked films, the DCEU fractured. Suicide Squad and The Suicide Squad are entirely separate movies released five years apart.

Troubled productions and turnover behind the camera made it worse. Fans campaigned for years after the 2017 theatrical Justice League until Warner Bros. released Snyder’s original vision as Zack Snyder’s Justice League in 2021.

Warner Bros. also kept DC stories outside the main universe. The CW’s Arrowverse, including Arrow, The Flash, Supergirl, and Black Lightning, built its own connected TV world. On the big screen, 2019’s Joker and 2022’s The Batman stood apart from the DCEU.

The split continued under Gunn and Safran. Joker: Folie à Deux arrived in 2024, while Matt Reeves’ Batman films and HBO’s The Penguin remain in their own world. John Cena’s Peacemaker, meanwhile, carried over from the old universe into the new one.

What Latcham inherits

The near-term slate is set. Man of Tomorrow remains on the calendar, and Reeves’ The Batman: Part II is still in production, with Steven Soderbergh recently brought in to shoot the remaining scenes. The series The People v. Gorilla Grodd is also in the works.

Beyond that, little is settled. It is not yet clear whether Corenswet’s Superman continues after Man of Tomorrow, whether Lanterns gets a second season, or whether Latcham starts over from scratch and hands fans another round of whiplash. Whether the universe Gunn and Safran built survives is a Riddler-worthy mystery.

Latcham helped build Hollywood’s most successful franchise once. Nearly two decades after Iron Man, he will find out whether that origin story can be repeated, or whether the superhero universe no longer comes with a reliable playbook.



Source link