Home Blog Page 62

Meryl Streep was ready to retire before ‘Devil Wears Prada 2’—so she demanded double the salary

0
Meryl Streep was ready to retire before 'Devil Wears Prada 2'—so she demanded double the salary

Meryl Streep just gave a masterclass in knowing your worth. The three-time Oscar winner—with an estimated net worth of $100 million—says she was low-balled when the call came in 2006 to star as The Devil Wears Prada’s high-powered, pouting, and feared editor-in-chief Miranda Priestly. And if the studio wouldn’t budge, Streep had already decided she was ready to walk away from Hollywood for good.

“They called me up, and they made an offer, and I said, ‘No, not going to do it,” Streep recalled in a recent interview with Today

After reading the script, Streep knew the film would land. She also knew she could earn more than they were offering. And she had nothing to lose: Already in her mid-50s with millions in the bank and two Oscars to her name, she was ready to walk away from acting entirely. So she turned down the job that a million girls would kill for.

“I knew it was going to be a hit, and I wanted to see if I doubled my ask,” she said. “And they went right away and said, sure. And I thought, I’m 50, 60—it took me this long to understand that I could do that.”

“They needed me,” Streep added. “I felt I was ready to retire. But you know, it was a lesson.”

It was indeed. The film went on to gross over $326 million worldwide, earn Streep her 14th Oscar nomination, and cement Miranda Priestly as one of cinema’s most iconic characters. Its much-anticipated sequel, The Devil Wears Prada 2, which hit theatres last month, has already more than doubled that, grossing $660 million and counting. 

And instead of retiring, Streep went on to have the biggest chapter of her career, with Mamma Mia!, Julie & Julia, and The Iron Lady—the latter landing her a third Oscar.

Today, Streep has starred in over 64 films, holds the record for the most Academy Award and Golden Globe nominations of any performer in history, and is widely considered one of the greatest actors in film history. 

Streep isn’t the only powerful woman who learned her worth later in life

Finance icon and self-made millionaire Suze Orman had her own version of the same reckoning. When a bidding war for her second book, The 9 Steps to Financial Freedom, hit $800,000 in the late 1990s, Orman told her literary agent to stop it there—even as offers climbed toward a million and a half.

“If somebody pays me that much money to write a book, I’m gonna get sick to my stomach,” she previously told Fortune. “I don’t want more than $800,000.”

Looking back, the reason was simple: “I didn’t think I was worth it.”

Like Streep, Orman discovered her self-worth and reached new heights of career success after saying no—to none other than Oprah Winfrey. It all started in 1998 when she was offered a spot on The Oprah Winfrey Show to talk about the spiritual side of divorce. Orman felt strongly that this wasn’t her area of expertise and became the first person ever to turn down the appearance, the producer told her.

Then again, just months later, she went up against her publisher, Random House, over the title of her third book.

“Break my contract,” She told her manager at the time. “I refuse to write a book for them.” In the end, Riverhead Books published the book under her title of choice in 1999, The Courage to be Rich. It went on to become a New York Times bestseller, and Orman appeared on The Oprah Show 29 times.

“You know your worth when you know your own thoughts,” she said. “When you keep asking everybody, ‘What do you think?’ and you’re constantly looking outside for what other people think or their approval, you do not know your own worth.”

Think you’re worth more? Here’s how to actually ask for it

For everyday workers, asking for a raise is a little more complicated than having a Hollywood epiphany and doubling your ask on the spot. But the underlying logic isn’t so different.

First, feelings won’t cut it. “Asking for a pay rise because you feel you work hard, deserve it, or are worth more money simply does not demonstrate why the company should further invest in you,” Sophia Procter, a former blue-chip company manager, previously advised Fortune.

Start by looking at job adverts for similar roles and speaking with recruiters to find out what someone at your level should actually be earning. 

Then, start noting down how your work has benefited the growth of your company, from positive client feedback to any sales you’ve generated—that’s your leverage. From there, you can begin quantifying the value you bring to the organization. 

Plus, Procter recommends adding $6,000-$19,000 to that figure—the approximate cost for employers to find your replacement, depending on your level of experience. Suddenly, a pay rise starts to look like the cheaper option.



Source link

Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

0
Prediction markets get first U.S. rule proposal as CFTC pursues contract reviews

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed its first prediction markets regulation on Wednesday, pitching an approach to how it can make widespread evaluations of whether contracts trip the federal standard for what’s off-limits.

The agency that regulates U.S. derivatives has been a defender of prediction markets such as those run by Kalshi, Polymarket and Crypto.com, with Chairman Mike Selig making them a top legal and regulatory priority for the CFTC. He’s been promising a new, tailored regulatory regime for the industry, and the new proposal addresses part of what may be multiple rules pursued by the regulator.

“The CFTC will protect the integrity of our regulated markets without standing in the way of responsible innovation,” Selig said in a statement. “This proposal gives the commission a durable, transparent framework to identify the contracts Congress directed us to scrutinize while letting legitimate markets move forward.”

Federal law holds that contracts involving war, terrorism, assassination, illegal activity and gaming can be deemed outside of the public interest and not allowed. In practice and in its recent embrace of data-sharing agreements with professional sports leagues, the CFTC has embraced the massively growing field of sports betting as an apparent public interest.

The platforms on which event contracts are traded are regulated exchanges under the CFTC, and the agency has said that exchanges are the first line of defence in determining whether contracts are legal and markets aren’t manipulated or abused.

The proposal weighs a 90-day review process on public-interest determinations for individual contracts.

President Donald Trump has recently expressed support for the track Selig has been on, saying in a social-media post that “Other Countries are after this new form of Financial Market, and we want to remain at the top.”



Source link

What Makes Roper (ROP) an Attractive Bet?

0
What Makes Roper (ROP) an Attractive Bet?


Dodge & Cox Fund, an investment management company, released its first-quarter 2026 investor letter for “Dodge and Cox Stock Fund”. A copy of the letter is available to download here. U.S. equities declined broadly in Q1 2026, with the S&P 500 falling 4.3% amid inflation concerns fueled by the conflict in Iran and disruptions in global energy markets. The Russell 1000 Value index rose 2.1%, outperforming the broader indices, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which fell 9.78%. Higher oil prices and interest rate shift pressured growth-oriented tech stocks, leading investors to move away from growth stocks. The Fund’s Class I shares returned -1.67%, outperforming the S&P 500, while lagging the Russell 1000 Value Index’s 2.10% returns. The firm anticipates that market leadership and sector rotations could affect short-term performance while maintaining a long-term investment outlook. In addition, please check the Fund’s top five holdings to know its best picks in 2026.

In its first-quarter 2026 investor letter, Dodge and Cox Stock Fund highlighted Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) as a newly added position. Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) is a technology company that designs and develops vertical software and technology-enabled products. On June 9, 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) closed at $335.37 per share. One-month return of Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) was 6.05%, and its shares lost 41.12% over the past 52 weeks. Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) has a market capitalization of $33.84 billion.

Dodge and Cox Stock Fund stated the following regarding Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) in its Q1 2026 investor letter:

“AI continued to dominate sentiment, as investors rewarded perceived AI “winners” and penalized perceived “losers” during the quarter, creating significant valuation dislocations. We believe a value-oriented approach is especially important in the current environment. The notable recent volatility has created opportunities in select areas, including the Software industry.

We also initiated a position in Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP), a leading software and technology company that provides critical technology solutions and systems of record for small and medium businesses. Following a recent decline in its stock price, Roper now trades at 16.1 times forward earnings—an attractive valuation given the company’s importance to its customer base, strong free cash flow generation, and active share buyback program.”

Roper (ROP) Ups Guidance, Announces $3B Buyback Expansion

Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) is not on our list of 40 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds Heading Into 2026. According to our database, 49 hedge fund portfolios held Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) at the end of the first quarter, up from 61 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

In another article, we covered Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) and shared the list of most oversold S&P 500 stocks so far in 2026. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q1 2026 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors.

READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 15 Stocks That Will Make You Rich in 10 Years.

Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.



Source link

BNB: Why a breakdown below THIS 4-month range could be crucial

0
BNB: Why a breakdown below THIS 4-month range could be crucial


On the 30th of May, Binance Coin [BNB] rallied beyond $700, breaking out of a near four-month range. This bullish breakout did not last long. Much has changed in June.

Bitcoin’s [BTC] descent accelerated, and the dip extended much deeper, going from $73.5k to $59.1k in five days.

BNB 1-day Chart
Source: BNB/USDT on TradingView

This bearish move saw BNB’s bullish breakout wiped out. The range low at $570 was tested as support. A brief bounce up to $610 occurred on Sunday, the 7th of June, but the bearish pressure has already forced BNB back below $600.

The OBV made a new multi-month low to signal heavy, persistent selling. The price bounce was capped at the 200-day moving average, showing that it was likely a liquidity grab before a bearish continuation.

On-chain metrics agree that BNB can see more downside

BNB Exchange Net Position ChangeBNB Exchange Net Position Change
Source: Glassnode

The exchange net position change tracks the 30-day change in supply held in exchange wallets. A rollover into negative territory implies coins leaving exchange wallets, which typically signals accumulation.

This buying need not translate into a positive price trend, though it does help identify market participant intent. The heavy outflows in February represented an absorption of selling, but the trend in place remained bearish in the higher timeframes.

Like the late March-early April exchange outflows, the negative net position change in recent days might be followed by a bounce, but a trend reversal remains far off.

BNB Percent Addresses in ProfitBNB Percent Addresses in Profit
Source: Glassnode

BNB addresses currently show a profit margin of 37.87%, the lowest since January 2024 but still well above the levels that marked the Q3 2023 market bottom. If past cycle patterns repeat, BNB could face a deeper decline in the coming months.

Should BNB traders sell  now?

BNB 4-hour ChartBNB 4-hour Chart
Source: BNB/USDT on TradingView

The price action was bearish on the 4-hour chart. The MACD remained below the zero line and could soon form another bearish crossover, as the price tried and failed to rise past the $610 local resistance.

Swing traders can consider waiting for a breakdown below the $570 range low to go short. Such a move would provide a clearer invalidation and also confirm a breakdown from the range.


Final Summary

  • The BNB exchange wallet supply trends signaled accumulation, but it need not result in a bullish trend reversal.
  • The 4-month range low at $570 has been defended, but a breakdown below this level could be around the corner.



Source link

Botanix bet big on ‘Bitcoin DeFi.’ Its shutdown suggests users never cared

0
Botanix bet big on 'Bitcoin DeFi.' Its shutdown suggests users never cared

Bitcoin layer-2 network Botanix is being wound down a year after its mainnet went live.

The project cited market conditions and broader indifference within the cryptocurrency industry towards establishing greater utility on the Bitcoin network, in a post on X on Tuesday.

“It did not work,” Botanix summed up. “At least not in this market and not in this timeline.”

The aim of Botanix was to bring Ethereum-equivalent functionality to the Bitcoin network, allowing applications and smart contracts to be effectively copied and pasted onto the world’s first blockchain. The project raised $14.4 million across two funding rounds in 2023 and 2024. Despite this, its total value locked (TVL) at closure was a mere $119,500, according to data from DeFiLlama.

Botanix was one of many layer-2s and protocols to emerge in recent years, aiming to expand Bitcoin’s utility and help it evolve beyond being just a store of value.

The idea was that holders of bitcoin don’t have to just let their asset sit idle and hope for price appreciation. They can also use decentralized finance to generate income on the side. This could involve staking tokens on other blockchain networks or using smart contract-enabled DeFi tools, such as lending or decentralized exchanges (DEXs).

Botanix post-mortem

However, it didn’t go as planned, at least not for Botanix.

The protocol highlighted that “making Bitcoin programmable, productive and integrated into real financial activity isn’t where real-world users sit right now.”

This post-mortem may raise questions about the broader viability of the Bitcoin development sector, which includes other layer-2s like Rootstock or rollups like Citrea, during an extended period of muted sentiment in the crypto market.

CoinDesk reached out to these two projects for comment, but none were received as of press time.

BTC has lost more than 50% of its value since hitting its all-time high of nearly $125,000 last October, which may leave investors wondering why they should be interested in developing bitcoin’s use when it’s not currently serving its more basic function of storing value very effectively.

“It’s possible that bitcoin’s role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that’s true, there will never be a market for what we are building and no amount of time or capital would change that,” Botanix said.

A simpler route to combining the secure store of wealth offered by BTC with the programmability and utility of other blockchain networks may lie in synthetic or “wrapped” bitcoin tokens. These are tokens that represent BTC on a 1:1 basis that can be traded and staked on networks like Ethereum.

The most established of these is wBTC, which was introduced in 2019, but more recently, Coinbase and Circle have developed their own synthetic bitcoin tokens to appeal to institutional investors and traders.

“For lending, yield, leveraged exposure, wBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient,” Botanix said.

“Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi.”



Source link

Asics spins off Onitsuka Tiger into standalone subsidiary

0
Asics spins off Onitsuka Tiger into standalone subsidiary


Asics Corporation is transferring its Onitsuka Tiger business to a wholly owned subsidiary, OT Group, via a simplified absorption-type company split.

The Japanese sportswear retailer said the split is due to take effect on 1 January 2027.

Its board of directors has approved the reorganisation, with OT Group set to serve as the global headquarters for the Onitsuka Tiger brand.

OT Group was incorporated on 25 February 2026, is based in Tokyo, and is led by president and CEO Ryoji Shoda.

The move is designed to give the brand a more independent operating structure while strengthening governance and improving business performance visibility across the broader Asics Group.

Under the transaction, Asics will act as the splitting company and OT Group as the succeeding company.

The company split agreement is due to be executed on 1 October 2026, with OT Group expected to secure shareholder approval on 16 November 2026.

As the transaction qualifies as a simplified absorption-type company split under Japan’s Companies Act, no approval from Asics shareholders is required.

In connection with the split, OT Group will issue 400 new common shares, all of which will be allotted to Asics.

The transaction will not affect Asics’ stated capital.

OT Group will assume the assets, liabilities, contracts and other rights and obligations associated with the Onitsuka Tiger business, as defined in the company split agreement.

The reorganisation will also involve spinning off Onitsuka Tiger operations run by Asics and its regional entities, with OT Group restructured to oversee subsidiaries responsible for sales and manufacturing operations.

For the fiscal year ended December 2025, the business division being transferred recorded non-consolidated net sales of Y6.66bn ($41.5m), comprising royalties and other income received by Asics from regional operating subsidiaries.

Assets to be transferred totalled Y2.71bn, against liabilities of Y248m.

Asics said the split is an internal reorganisation involving a consolidated subsidiary and is expected to have a minimal impact on its consolidated financial results.

“Asics spins off Onitsuka Tiger into standalone subsidiary” was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand.



Source link

‘Market integrity’ or DeFi risk? Paradigm, HPC question stablecoin rule scope

0
‘Market integrity’ or DeFi risk? Paradigm, HPC question stablecoin rule scope


On the 9th of June, the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) and the venture capital firm Paradigm jointly sent a comment letter to the US Treasury.

In the letter, they asked the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) to improve certain aspects of their proposed stablecoin compliance rule linked to the GENIUS Act.

They said,

We broadly support the proposed rule, and in particular FinCEN’s decision to tailor most issuer obligations to the primary market, but write to recommend that certain secondary market obligations be clarified or narrowed to avoid unintended consequences for permissionless blockchain infrastructure and the DeFi ecosystem.

Key six pointers listed by Paradigm and the HPC

Having said that, Paradigm and the HPC listed six crucial areas in which they think regulators ought to improve the proposed stablecoin regulations. They demanded more precise rules about the obligations of stablecoin developers and issuers regarding secondary-market trading.

The group further urged for clarification on when issuers must block, freeze, or reject transactions. They also proposed enhancements to safe harbor protections for Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) filings. Additionally, the groups urged regulators to clarify the extent of adherence to legitimate government directives.

They also called for the improvement of Customer Due Diligence (CDD) regulations. Moreover, they are eyeing further clarification on secondary market obligations pertaining to sanctions, including the definition of an effective sanctions compliance program.

Simply put, the goal of the recommendations is to guarantee that the requirements for compliance are realistic, well-defined, and compatible with the way decentralized blockchain networks function.

Community reaction and more

Although the GENIUS Act specifically forbids stablecoin issuers from paying out yields to holders, third-party cryptocurrency companies are exempt from this rule.

To solve this problem, the CLARITY Act will maintain activity-based stablecoin rewards. The passage of the latter will allow exchanges and other third-party businesses to allocate yield according to this standard.

This move was also praised by the crypto community, as noted by Jacob Robinson, host of Law of Code, who said, 

Jacob Robinson
Source: Jacob Robinson/X

Echoing similar sentiments, Brad Bourque, Policy Counsel at HPC, added, 

Brad BourqueBrad Bourque
Source: Brad Bourque/X

Main concerns 

Here, the primary worry expressed is that the proposed rules of the GENIUS Act may inadvertently extend them to decentralized blockchain infrastructure and secondary-market activity.

They contend that excessively stringent KYC, sanctions, and monitoring regulations may deter issuers from using permissionless blockchains, impede DeFi innovation, and drive operations offshore.

This comes as a comprehensive new stablecoin regulation framework has been proposed by the New York State Department of Financial Services [NYDFS].

Its purpose is to bring the state’s oversight system into compliance with federal requirements under the GENIUS Act. 


Final Summary

  • Their primary concern is that broad compliance regulations may impose regulatory duties on DeFi infrastructure and secondary market participants in addition to stablecoin issuers.
  • They urged regulators to keep a clear separation between secondary-market transactions and primary-market activities.



Source link