Home Blog Page 107

Bitcoin and ethereum prices today, Friday, May 29, 2026: Prices open lower, despite news of U.S.-Iran truce

0
Bitcoin and ethereum prices today, Friday, May 29, 2026: Prices open lower, despite news of U.S.-Iran truce


Bitcoin (BTC-USD) opened at $73,525.74 on Friday, down 1.1% from Thursday’s opening price. The value of bitcoin fell further to $73,381.81 by 7:42 a.m ET.

Ethereum (ETH-USD) opened at $2,006.97 on Friday, down 0.7% from Thursday’s opening price. The value of ethereum ticked lower to $2,003.66 as of 7:42 a.m. ET.

The prices for both bitcoin and ethereum opened at their lowest levels all week, but the stage is set for the cryptocurrencies to rise in value today and this weekend after reports that a 60-day truce extension with Iran is on the president’s desk awaiting his signature.

Investors appeared to have less of a risk appetite this week as tensions between the U.S. and Iran grew following the news that the U.S. military launched defense strikes against Iranian drones and a drone-launching site.

Any sign of progress towards a meaningful agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz is likely to compel more investors back into crypto.

Current price of bitcoin and ethereum

Bitcoin

The price of bitcoin this morning was down 1.1% from Thursday’s opening figure. Here’s a look at how the opening bitcoin price has changed versus last week, month, and year:

  • One week ago: -5.2%

  • One month ago: -3.7%

  • One year ago: -31.8%

The all-time high for bitcoin was $126,198.07 on Oct. 6, 2025. The all-time low value for bitcoin was $0.04865 on July 14, 2010.

Ethereum

The price of ethereum this morning was down 0.7% compared to Thursday’s open. Here’s how the opening ethereum price has changed versus last week, month, and year:

  • One week ago: -5.8%

  • One month ago: -12.3%

  • One year ago: -25.2%

The all-time high for ethereum was $4,953.73 on Aug. 24, 2025. The all-time low value for ethereum was $0.4209 on Oct. 21, 2015.

Bitcoin, ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies are rapidly evolving. Follow the latest developments from Yahoo Finance and others here.

Can you buy your next house with crypto?

So, you put a little mad money into bitcoin a few years ago. Now, your crypto-fueled profit means you have a sweet nest egg to put toward a house.

But can you buy a house with crypto rather than using cash or a traditional mortgage loan? What are the roadblocks? And what about taxes?

President Trump wants the United States to be “the crypto capital of the world.” In that spirit, in late June, Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) William J. Pulte ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to “prepare their businesses to count cryptocurrency as an asset for a mortgage.”

The FHFA supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that fund a major portion of the mortgage industry.

Pulte said the housing system “needs a massive upgrade,” adding, “I want people who own cryptocurrency to be able to buy homes like everyone else. I believe cryptocurrency is an asset. I believe Americans should be able to use their crypto if they want to. It’s time the housing system caught up.”

This signals what could be a fundamental change to how cryptocurrency may be used to qualify for a mortgage.

Learn more: Want to buy a house with crypto? Here’s what to expect

Bitcoin and ethereum price charts

Whether you’re brand new to tracking the value of bitcoin and ethereum or a more seasoned crypto investor, Yahoo Finance’s price-of-bitcoin chart and price-of-ethereum chart below show a visual history of how the currencies’ value continues to move and evolve.

More information on crypto from the Yahoo Finance team: 



Source link

I built a Fortune 1000 career most people wouldn’t walk away from. Then I did

0
I built a Fortune 1000 career most people wouldn’t walk away from. Then I did

In my late 20s, like many ambitious young professionals who grew up believing they could build anything they put their mind to, I started my own technology consulting company.`

Over five years, I poured everything I had into building it. We landed impressive clients, grew to 45 employees, and built a culture I was deeply proud of.

Then the 2008 financial crisis hit.

When I saw the economy starting to shift, I tried pivoting the business toward areas I believed would be more insulated from the downturn, including government contracting work designed to support small businesses. But eventually even those opportunities started disappearing. I remember realizing that one of the very strategies I’d relied on to help us survive was no longer viable.

That was the moment I knew we weren’t going to make it.

With no VC or private equity backing and no network of advisors helping me navigate a financial crisis, I found myself figuring out how to unwind the company while simultaneously having honest conversations with my employees whose livelihoods depended on it. It was incredibly humbling.

After it was over, I took the first real vacation I’d had in years. When I came home, I sat down with my dad, a Vietnam combat veteran who’s always been a grounding force in my life, and explained how devastated I felt losing something I’d poured my heart and soul into building.

He listened patiently, smiled, and said, “Honey, at least nobody’s shooting at you.”

We both laughed, but the perspective stayed with me.

As painful as that chapter was, I realized something important. I hadn’t lost my ability to work. I hadn’t lost my experience, my resilience, or the knowledge I’d gained building and then unwinding a company through crisis.

I started thinking about what skill sets I didn’t have that might’ve better prepared me for what I’d been through. Strategic foresight and anticipatory risk were at the top. I realized while I’d learned how to build a business, I hadn’t yet learned how large organizations architect resilience at scale or navigate uncertainty before it becomes a crisis.

So instead of immediately starting another company, I made a decision to start over inside corporate America and intentionally learn everything I’d missed the first time around.

I joined a Fortune 1000 critical internet infrastructure provider as a contract project manager and became a full-time employee a year later. I approached the role with the same ownership mentality I’d developed as an entrepreneur, raising my hand for problems nobody else wanted to solve. 

Eventually, that work ethic and constant desire to learn led me into executive leadership, where among other responsibilities I became Chief of Staff to the CEO. For many professionals, reaching the top levels of a multibillion-dollar company is the finish line. Earlier in my career, I probably would’ve said the same thing.

But then something unexpected happened.

I realized I’d reached a point where there was nowhere left for me to grow.

The Career Ceiling Nobody Warns You About

We hear a lot about executives leaving senior leadership positions because of burnout or work-life balance. Those are real concerns, but there’s another reason people walk away from positions they’ve spent decades chasing that we don’t talk about enough. Sometimes the growth trajectory simply stops.

Research from McKinsey’s 2025 Women in the Workplace report found employees become significantly less likely to see opportunities for advancement at senior levels as leadership pathways narrow. The higher you climb, the fewer opportunities exist for meaningful upward movement.

After rebuilding my career, I found myself facing a reality I hadn’t anticipated. The challenge and steep learning curve that had fueled me for years started disappearing. I realized there was nowhere left for me to grow in the way that energized me most.

That realization forced me to confront a difficult truth. I could stay in a position I’d already proven I could do, or I could leave the comfort of what I’d built behind and step into the unknown in pursuit of new growth.

Having already lived through one major career reinvention and not just survived, but thrived because of it, I chose the latter.

The Jobs Nobody Wants Are Usually the Ones That Change Your Career

One of the most valuable lessons I learned rebuilding my career was this. The opportunities that accelerate your growth are rarely the ones everyone else is competing for.

I built my career by volunteering for the projects nobody wanted to touch. If there was a messy operational challenge or a cross-functional initiative with no clear ownership, I raised my hand to lead it.

Part of that came from my entrepreneurial urge to solve problems when they arose, and that mindset ended up becoming a significant differentiator. According to LinkedIn’s 2025 Workplace Learning Report, adaptability and problem solving remain two of the most in-demand leadership capabilities as organizations navigate technological disruption and economic uncertainty.

What surprised me most was that the less glamorous assignments often created the greatest visibility and growth. Those projects gave me exposure across operations, engineering, governance, risk, and strategy. They taught me how businesses actually function under pressure, not just how they’re supposed to function on paper.

Over time, those uncomfortable assignments became the very experiences that carried me into executive leadership.

Pressure Doesn’t Build Leaders. It Reveals Them.

When people talk about high-pressure environments, the conversation usually centers around stress and burnout, but pressure also reveals the quality of leadership already operating under the surface.

Leading inside critical internet infrastructure and information security meant operating in environments where trust and reliability were paramount and needed to be monitored constantly. Every cyber breach announcement or regulatory shift created pressure spikes that demanded immediate action and disciplined decision making.

Early in my career, I thought strong leadership meant matching the intensity of the moment. Over time, I learned the opposite was true. The best leaders aren’t the loudest people in the room during uncertainty. They’re the calmest.

PwC’s 2025 Global CEO Survey found that leaders increasingly view adaptability, resilience, and trust-building as critical leadership traits in environments defined by disruption and uncertainty.

Pressure taught me that leadership isn’t tested during stable periods. It’s tested when things become unclear, uncomfortable, or unpredictable. That’s when your values either hold steady or disappear entirely.

And ironically, the more pressure I experienced throughout my career, the less afraid I became of it. In fact, I learned to thrive under pressure by developing the skills needed to operate within it while maintaining clarity, integrity, and sound judgment when the stakes were high.

Earlier this year, I made the difficult decision to leave the executive role I’d spent most of my career working toward. Not because I was running from pressure, but because I still wanted to grow.

Looking back now, I realize the financial crisis taught me something long before I fully understood it. No title, company, or chapter of your life lasts forever. But your ability to adapt, learn, and rebuild travels with you wherever you go.

For most of my career, I thought success was about reaching the top. Now, I’ve come to realize that, at least for me, it’s about having the courage to keep evolving once you get there.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.



Source link

Bitcoin (BTC) underperforms risk assets as record 9th day of ETF outflows signal waning demand: Crypto Daily

0
Bitcoin (BTC) underperforms risk assets as record 9th day of ETF outflows signal waning demand: Crypto Daily


Bitcoin is stabilizing near $73,500, about 10% below its monthly high of $81,000. Data suggests the stall reflects a shortage of new buyers rather than a plethora of sellers.

Risk assets broadly advanced after reports that U.S.-Iran negotiations could reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil passageway, lifted sentiment.

“The expectations of a de-escalation in geopolitical tension and the normalization of the Strait of Hormuz are reducing pressure on oil prices,” analysts at Spanish lender Bankinter wrote in a market note.

Against that supportive backdrop, bitcoin’s weakness looks crypto-specific. Long-term holder supply has reached a record 15.8 million BTC, according to CryptoQuant, normally a bullish signal because it reflects coins held rather than traded. The firm argued the record may be hollow, reflecting slowing market turnover rather than conviction.

Short-term holder supply has fallen about 2.2 million BTC since December. That includes roughly 900,000 BTC of Coinbase reserves that crossed the 155-day long-term-holder threshold by sitting still. The record is partly an artifact of inactivity, not fresh buying.

Demand from spot bitcoin ETFs, a key driver of the past two years’ rally, has cooled. Glassnode said inflows and spot demand remain too weak to sustain a move above cost-basis levels near $78,000. Net outflows from the ETFs reached a record nine-day streak on Thursday.

Glassnode’s realized profit/loss ratio sits at 1.56, below levels typical of stronger bull markets. On Polymarket, traders are assigning a strong probability bitcoin closes the month between $72,000 and $76,000. Stay alert!

Read more: For analysis of today’s activity in altcoins and derivatives, see Crypto Markets Today . For a comprehensive list of events this week, see CoinDesk’s “Crypto Week Ahead.”

What’s trending

Today’s signal

The ratio of altcoins (excluding the top 10) to bitcoin is currently just above its 50-week exponential moving average, a sign of strength relative to largest cryptocurrency.

If the ratio ends the week above that level, the next resistance is a 20% increase relative to bitcoin, which would indicate sustained momentum across the broader altcoin universe.



Source link

Analysts alarmed as Strategy transfers $30 mln Bitcoin: ‘Someone is going to lose badly’

0
Analysts alarmed as Strategy transfers $30 mln Bitcoin: 'Someone is going to lose badly'


Michael Saylor’s Strategy is the headline today for moving 411.48 Bitcoin, worth $30.3 million, into Coinbase Prime.

As of this writing, the intention for the move was still unclear. However, the community speculated that this was likely a potential sell-off signal by the firm. 

Some factors fueling these speculations are recent statements by Strategy’s leadership that they may sell some of their BTC holdings in the future.

In fact, in a recent interview with Fox Business, Strategy CEO Phong Le said

There may be a week-to-week or day-to-day decision that we should sell BTC because it’s accretive to our shareholders in the long term. We likely sell BTC at some point in time.

He noted that one reason the firm would sell BTC is to “capitalize on unrealized tax losses.” The firm had a net loss of $12.54 billion in Q1 2026, primarily due to the BTC price pullback. 

There is an 86% chance that Strategy sells BTC in 2026

Phong Le assured that they’ll always be ‘net buying’ BTC, even if they occasionally sell part of their stash. But the market expected the sell-off spree could start as early as June. 

According to Polymarket, the market was pricing a 67% and 86% chance that Strategy sells BTC by June or December 2026. 

Source: Polymarket 

Another reason for sell-off fears was the recent retirement of $1.5 billion of its convertible debt that was due in 2029. 

For analyst Glenn Cameron of Onramp Bitcoin, Strategy burned its USD reserve meant for covering preferred stock interest obligations, including Stretch (STRC), to retire the convertible debt. 

Now the USD reserve coverage has dropped from 2.5 years ($2.25B in February) to about six months ($871M as of May). Cameron warned, 

STRC investors better hope nothing unexpected freezes that ATM (stock sale) window.

Strategy MSTRStrategy MSTR
Source: Strategy

Jeff Dorman, CIO of Arca, also questioned the firm’s convertible debt move and cautioned

This is the first time that MSTR, BTC, and Pref holders are really in a bind. Someone is going to lose badly here, and it will happen in the next 4 months.

Amid the FUD, the BTC price extended its pullback to $72K, erasing nearly all Q2 gains. But it attempted to defend the range low of its 2026 ascending channel. 

Strategy Strategy
Source: BTC/USDT, TradingView 

Final Summary

  • Strategy moved $30M into Coinbase Prime, reigniting sell-off fears. 
  • CEO Phong Le said they could sell BTC for tax loss harvesting



Source link

Gold prices today, Friday, May 29: Gold prices tick upward on possible truce extension with Iran

0
Gold prices today, Friday, May 29: Gold prices tick upward on possible truce extension with Iran


Gold (GC=F) August futures opened at $4,527.60 per troy ounce on Friday, down just 0.1% compared to Thursday’s closing price. The gold price moved higher in early trading. At 6:27 a.m. ET, the price of gold reached $4,560.40.

Reports that President Trump has received a 60-day truce extension with Iran, which he could sign at some point today, have renewed hope in the markets that a resolution to the war is not far behind and that the Strait of Hormuz can once again reopen with unrestricted access.

Investors have little to go on besides hope that both sides are making strides toward a peaceful resolution that would restart the flow of oil and natural gas to countries around the world.

This week, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index, rose 3.8% in April, a three-year high, driven by the war in Iran. Inflation concerns have all but cemented the Fed’s position to keep rates at current levels following the next Fed meeting in mid-June.

Current price of gold

The opening price of June gold futures on Friday was nearly flat compared to Thursday’s closing price. Here’s a look at how the gold price has changed versus last week, month, and year:

  • One week ago: +0.2%

  • One month ago: -1.5%

  • One year ago: +37.9%

On Jan. 29, gold’s one-year gain was 95.6%.

24/7 gold price tracking: Don’t forget you can monitor the current price of gold on Yahoo Finance 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Want to learn more about the current top-performing companies in the gold industry? Explore a list of the top-performing companies in the gold industry using the Yahoo Finance Screener. You can create your own screeners with over 150 different screening criteria.

How much gold should you own?

A gold investment can add stability and inflation protection to your portfolio. But it can also dilute your gains when stock prices are rising quickly. Finding the right balance between gold’s diversification benefits and profiting from growth potential in other assets can be challenging.

Even the experts are divided on how to achieve the correct balance. Below, five experts explain their recommended gold allocations, which range from 0% to 20%.

Learn more: How to invest in gold in 4 steps

No gold: Trade-off is too high

Robert R. Johnson, professor at Creighton University’s Heider College of Business, does not advocate gold investing. In his words, “while having a small position in precious metals may dampen portfolio volatility in the short-run, the tradeoff between slightly dampened volatility and the lost long-term return is certainly not a prudent one, particularly for Gen Z/millennials with long investing time horizons.”

2% to 5% allocation, depending on the situation

Brett Elliott, director of content and SEO at American Precious Metals Exchange (APMEX), recommends setting an allocation that aligns with your investing goals.

Growth-oriented investors may be comfortable with an allocation of 10% or 15%, according to Elliott. But income investors will prefer a smaller position, because gold provides no yield. A 2% to 5% gold allocation can provide some resiliency without an excessive drag on income potential.

Learn more: Who decides what gold is worth? How gold prices are determined.

5% to 8% gold allocation

Blake McLaughlin, executive vice president at Axcap Ventures, said historical data support a gold allocation of 5% to 8%. “Gold may not offer the outsized return potential of private investments, but the metal holds a set of attributes that are increasingly hard to ignore,” according to McLaughlin. Those attributes include the metal’s resilience amid economic uncertainty and geopolitical unrest.

5% to 15% gold allocation

Thomas Winmill, portfolio manager at Midas Funds, believes most investors will benefit from a long-term gold allocation of 5% to 15%. Winmill specifically advocates investing in gold mining companies through a mutual fund.

Your risk tolerance and current mix of financial versus hard assets can guide you to an appropriate allocation, according to Winmill.

  1. Risk tolerance: Keep your allocation percentage low if you tend to panic in volatile cycles.

  2. Financial vs. hard assets: Financial assets are stocks and bonds. Hard assets include tangible items like real estate, gold, collectibles, classic cars, and equipment. If you have no home equity and your wealth is primarily in financial assets, you can set your gold allocation higher. Or, if your home is paid for and more valuable than your stock portfolio, gold investing may not be necessary.

Learn more: Thinking of buying gold? Here’s what investors should watch for.

20% gold allocation

Vince Stanzione, CEO and founder at First Information, recommends a 20% gold allocation, specifically in physical gold or a gold ETF. Stanzione argues for a higher exposure to gold as a wealth protection strategy. As he says, “gold keeps with inflation and gold retains its purchasing power,” while paper currencies are devaluing around the world.

Learn more: Gold IRA: Benefits, risks, and how it differs from a traditional IRA

Price of gold chart

Whether you’re tracking the price of gold since last month or last year, the price-of-gold chart below shows the precious metal’s change in value so far this year.



Source link

STRC slips below par as Strategy’s (MSTR) cash reserves face growing scrutiny

0
STRC slips below par as Strategy's (MSTR) cash reserves face growing scrutiny

Strategy’s perpetual preferred security, Stretch (STRC), fell as low as $97.11 on Thursday as bitcoin slipped to the $73,000 mark.

STRC tends to face selling pressure during bitcoin drawdowns and in the days immediately following its ex-dividend date, as seen on Nov. 20 and Feb. 5. The ex-dividend effect typically results in a price adjustment reflecting the value of the dividend, while periods of bitcoin weakness can reduce investor appetite for Strategy-related securities. Together, these factors have historically created short-term pressure on STRC’s market price.

The company has structured STRC to trade near its $100 par value, as maintaining that level enables Strategy to continue issuing shares through its at-the-market (ATM) program and raise additional capital efficiently.

Strategy repurchased $1.5 billion of its 0% convertible senior notes due 2029 recently, reducing its overall debt burden. However, the buyback was funded using cash from the company’s U.S. dollar reserve. Strategy’s cash balance declined from approximately $2.25 billion to $871 million as a result.

Based on the company’s current annual preferred dividend obligations of roughly $1.7 billion, the remaining cash reserve now provides only about six months of coverage but was initially implemented to cover the dividend obligations for 24 months.

Executive Chairman Michael Saylor discussed several potential sources of capital that could be used to meet dividend obligations and support the balance sheet in a recent interview with CoinDesk Senior Analyst James Van Straten. These include selling bitcoin, issuing additional MSTR equity when the stock trades above a 1.22x multiple to net asset value (NAV), or raising capital through STRC issuance. Saylor emphasized that management evaluates these decisions through the lens of bitcoin per share, prioritizing actions that are accretive to shareholders.

Competing bitcoin treasury company Strive Asset Management (ASST) has taken a different approach. The company recently announced daily dividend payments for its perpetual preferred security, SATA. For the past two weeks, SATA has remained tightly anchored around its $100 par value while offering a dividend yield of approximately 13%, even during bitcoin’s decline.

Although the daily dividend mechanism has not yet been implemented, investors may view it as a stabilizing feature that helps keep the security trading close to par.

Strive has also eliminated all debt inherited through its acquisition of Semler Scientific, a balance-sheet strategy that mirrors the direction Strategy appears to be pursuing through its recent debt repurchases.

The market performance gap between the two companies has been notable. Over the past three months, Strive shares have gained approximately 110%, compared with a 12% rise in MSTR and an 8% increase in bitcoin. This divergence suggests investors may be rewarding Strive’s cleaner balance sheet and higher-yielding preferred structure.



Source link

47-year-old high-end steak and seafood chain closes 80 locations

0
47-year-old high-end steak and seafood chain closes 80 locations


The steakhouse restaurant sector has faced a major impact from an increase in beef costs, as steak prices spiked 16% to $12.73 per pound in March 2026, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, WIBC- Radio reported.

As the price of beef increases for restaurants, consumer demand for the product has declined as menu prices also rise, reducing sales at steakhouses.

Reduced sales have led certain establishments to close their businesses.

McCormick & Schmick’s steak and seafood restaurant closed its last Pittsburgh location.ShengImages/Shutterstock

McCormick & Schmick’s location closes

Restaurant chain owner Landry’s Inc. closed its high-end McCormick & Schmick’s steak and seafood dining location in downtown Pittsburgh, after it had operated for 18 years, the company announced on May 26 in a notice on the restaurant’s front door, according to KDKA-TV.

“We regret to inform you that this location has closed,” the message read.

“We are grateful for the support of our community and encourage our guests to visit us at our sister locations nearby!” the notice said.

The message listed six Landry’s sister restaurants near the closed restaurant: Del Frisco’s, Ground Concourse, Morton’s, Bill’s Bar & Burger, Houlihan’s, and Mitchell’s Fish Market.

Landry’s did not reveal a reason for closing the downtown Pittsburgh McCormick & Schmick’s location.

“After many years serving the downtown Pittsburgh community, McCormick & Schmick’s on Fifth Avenue has made the difficult decision to close its doors,” Shah Ghani, the company’s chief operating officer, said in a statement to KDKA.

“We are incredibly grateful to our loyal guests and dedicated team members for allowing us to be part of so many celebrations, traditions, and memorable moments over the years, Ghani said.

The company is transitioning employees to nearby sister locations, he said.

Chain had 94 restaurants

Founders Bill McCormick and Douglas Schmick owned about 94 restaurants at the company’s peak in 2009, including mostly McCormick & Schmick’s locations, as well as Jake’s Famous Crawfish, M&S Grill, McCormick & Kuleto’s, William Douglas Steakhouse, and The Boathouse, according to The Oregonian.

The company opened the city’s first McCormick & Schmick’s at SouthSide Works in 2005, followed by the downtown Pittsburgh location in 2008. The company closed the SouthSide location in 2021, according to KDKA.

McCormick & Schmick’s slashes 80 stores

McCormick & Schmick’s has closed about 80 locations since its peak and currently operates 14 locations in 11 states, plus M&S Catering at the Museum of Flight in Seattle.

Landry’s traces McCormick & Schmick’s roots to 1974, according to its website, before Bill McCormick purchased Jake’s Famous Crawfish in 1975 and created the partnership chain with Douglas Schmick in 1979.

McCormick & Schmick’s sold the chain to Landry’s in November 2011 for $131.6 million, The Oregonian reported.

Other high-end steakhouse chains have also been forced to close locations because of rising food costs and declining consumer demand.

Related: Burger chain franchisee in bankruptcy is liquidating 49 stores

Other steakhouses close locations

High-end dining chain Stoney River Steakhouse and Grill said it will close its Towson, Md., restaurant location by June 26, 2026, and lay off 68 employees, according to a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification notice that the company filed with the Maryland Department of Labor on April 20.

“After close evaluation of the market, we have made the difficult decision to close the Towson location,” Chris Conlon, executive vice president of operations at owner SPB Hospitality, said in a statement, according to The Baltimore Banner. “Employees have been offered various opportunities, including the option to transfer to nearby locations.”

Stoney River Steakhouse and Grill operates 14 restaurants in nine states, including Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Tennessee.

Another high-end steakhouse chain, 801 Chophouse, whose parent filed for bankruptcy protection on April 10, closed an affiliate restaurant in Minneapolis, 801 Nicollet, which had previously operated under another name, 801 Fish.

Parent 801 Restaurant Group LLC owns eight 801 Chophouse locations in Denver; Des Moines, Iowa; Kansas City and St. Louis, Mo.; Leawood, Kan.; Minneapolis; Omaha, Neb.; and Tysons Corner, Va.

Related: Beloved Thai restaurant chain files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

This story was originally published by TheStreet on May 28, 2026, where it first appeared in the Restaurants section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.



Source link