Home Blog Page 51

What happens to Satoshi’s BTC when Bitcoin’s quantum problem is fixed?

0
Bitcoin trades near $77,700 as analysts eye $75,000 support after liquidation wave

Many are assumed to belong to Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto and other owners who lost their keys, which means they can never be moved to safety. Another 5 million or so are exposed through address reuse, according to Project11, a research group tracking the issue, though most of those are thought to be active holdings in exchange wallets.

Swapping in quantum-resistant signatures is the easy part, but the fight is over the coins nobody moves. One camp argues for a hard deadline, after which the signature schemes Bitcoin uses today, ECDSA and Schnorr, stop being accepted and any unmigrated coins become unspendable. Leaving them live, this side says, hands a future attacker, potentially a sanctioned state like North Korea, a stash of bitcoin large enough to crash the price and taint the network’s legitimacy.

The other camp calls that confiscation, a violation of the absolute property rights Bitcoin was built on, and warns it sets a precedent for freezing coins under government pressure later.

Between them sit the several proposals CoinDesk has tracked over the past two months.

Hourglass would cap how many vulnerable coins can be spent per block to prevent a supply flood. BIP-361, from developer Jameson Lopp and others, would let migrated holders prove ownership after the cutoff with a quantum-resistant proof that exposes no key. PACTs, from Paradigm’s Dan Robinson, would let owners timestamp a private claim now and move funds later without revealing anything today.



Source link

Is James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) among the Best Insurance Stocks to Buy Following Q1 Earnings?

0
Is James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) among the Best Insurance Stocks to Buy Following Q1 Earnings?


With an upside potential of 35.86%, James River Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is among the 10 Best Insurance Stocks to Buy Following Q1 Earnings.

On May 19, UBS downgraded James River Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:JRVR) to Neutral from Buy and reduced its price target to $4.75 from $8.00. The firm cited a higher cost of equity capital stemming from increased risks related to adverse reserve development. UBS also noted that intensifying competition within the small- to middle-market excess and surplus lines sector could make it more difficult for the company to achieve meaningful growth, leading the analyst to adopt a more cautious stance on the shares.

Previously, on May 5, Citizens downgraded James River Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:JRVR) to Market Perform from Outperform without assigning a price target. The firm pointed to disappointing first-quarter results and highlighted that the company utilized approximately two-thirds of its remaining excess and surplus adverse development cover limit, leaving only $7.5 million available for potential future adverse development. According to the analyst, the reduced protection weakens a key risk-mitigation mechanism that had previously provided investors with greater confidence regarding reserve-related exposures.

Founded in 2002 and headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda, James River Group Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:JRVR) is an insurance holding company that owns and operates a group of specialty property-casualty insurance and reinsurance companies, operating primarily in the U.S. excess and surplus (E&S) lines market.

While we acknowledge the potential of JRVR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

READ NEXT: 10 Under-the-Radar AI Stocks to Buy in 2026 and Top 10 Stocks That Members of Congress Own.

Disclosure: None.  Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.



Source link

XRP prediction: Sentiment falls to an eight-month low, and that has been a buy signal before

0
XRP prediction: Sentiment falls to an eight-month low, and that has been a buy signal before

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse called it “the moment” for the industry, saying the industry deserved “the same rules and protections as every other asset class.”

Standard Chartered projected $4 billion to $8 billion in additional inflows into U.S. spot XRP exchange-traded funds if the bill passes. They have attracted roughly $1.4 billion since January, according to SoSoValue data.

The same discrepancy shows up on the XRP Ledger blockchain. Payment counts, automated market making activity and tokenized real-world assets all hit records this year while the token’s price kept falling. Pilot projects kept stacking up, including one that had Ondo, JPMorgan’s Kinexys, Mastercard and Ripple settling tokenized Treasuries across the ledger in seconds.

Santiment pointed to the same split, with development activity, ledger usage and institutional products advancing as social enthusiasm faded.

The exhaustion has a history. Santiment noted that some of XRP’s strongest rebounds came when the crowd was at its most disinterested, with discussion volume falling and commentary overwhelmingly negative, the same setup as now.

Sentiment readings are a contrarian tool and not a timer, however. The signal indicates that the sellers who talk have mostly stopped talking. Whether that marks a turning point depends on whether the demand that years of waiting were supposed to unlock finally shows up.



Source link

Maelstrom backs Bitcoin privacy – Days after dumping its entire Zcash bag

0
Maelstrom backs Bitcoin privacy - Days after dumping its entire Zcash bag


Maelstrom, the family office of BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, is pushing further into crypto privacy, with two of the four developers it funds through its Bitcoin Grant Program now working full-time on tools that make transactions harder to trace.

The fund disclosed the split in its first annual report on the program, which has paid open-source developers in monthly Bitcoin installments under 12-month contracts since October 2024 and caps grant stacking at $400,000 a year.

Benalleng and Macgyver handle the privacy work, while Rkrux and Stratospher contribute to Bitcoin Core, the network’s main software. Maelstrom framed the grants as long-term backing for Bitcoin’s technical development.

The report said,

The program is aiming to provide its grantees with relatively stable and long term funding. The developers are working on open source technology to improve Bitcoin, with respect to scalability, robustness and privacy.

The two privacy projects attack traceability from different angles. One lets the sender and receiver jointly add inputs to a single transaction so it no longer resembles a standard payment, breaking common surveillance heuristics.

The other lets recipients accept funds without reusing or publishing addresses.

Bitcoin wallets and Solana race to close the same privacy gap

Vikrant Sharma, founder of Cake Wallet, told AMBCrypto that the wallet’s Bitcoin Silent Payments and Payjoin v2 integration fills a gap Bitcoin left open.

“People want to use Bitcoin on the go and they don’t want to reveal their history and balances and all that. Bitcoin is open and permissionless but without privacy, it’s a surveillance tool.”

The same push is reshaping other chains. Helius’s acquisition of Light Protocol aims to build a programmable, fully on-chain privacy layer for Solana, covering encrypted balances and payments for both retail and institutional users.

Maelstrom exits Zcash even as it funds Bitcoin privacy

The grants land as Hayes confirms Maelstrom has sold its entire position in Zcash [ZEC], one of the largest privacy tokens.

He tied the exit to a vulnerability in Zcash’s Orchard pool that could have allowed counterfeit ZEC to be minted undetected. Hayes said he viewed actual minting as unlikely but could not cryptographically rule it out, and he left the door open to re-entry.

He said,

We [Maelstrom] will consistently re-evaluate our thinking and if my assumptions are proven incorrect, will rebuy, hopefully at lower prices.

Privacy tokens remain a fraction of the broader market, with a combined capitalization near $51 billion led by Zcash [ZEC], Monero [XMR], and Dash [DASH], and press-time trading volume of $3.3 billion.


Final Summary

  • Arthur Hayes’ family office Maelstrom is funding Bitcoin privacy work, with half its grant recipients now focused on making transactions harder to trace.
  • The move comes just after Maelstrom sold its entire ZEC holding over a security scare.



Source link

Musk’s SpaceX raises $75 billion in largest IPO ever

0
Musk's SpaceX raises $75 billion in largest IPO ever


June 11 (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s SpaceX raised the $75 billion it targeted in a hotly awaited IPO on Thursday, selling shares at a fixed price of $135 that valued the space, satellite and AI company at $1.77 trillion.

The largest ‌ever IPO cements SpaceX’s status as one of the world’s most valuable companies. Its shares will begin trading ‌on the Nasdaq on Friday.

Here are some comments on the IPO:

MARK KLEIN, CEO AND PRESIDENT OF SURO CAPITAL:

“The IPO parade, which now looks like it’s turning ​into a stampede, has been coming for a while. You could argue there were flickers of it as early as last year, but it never fully materialized into a broad wave of companies. SpaceX is going to be the bellwether.”

NANCY TENGLER, CEO AND CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER OF LAFFER TENGLER INVESTMENTS:

“From our perspective, it is definitely an AI company, but we’re focused on the benefits, scale, and cost ‌reductions that could come from building data centers ⁠in space and from making Starship fully reusable. They’re not there yet. They’re saying the second half of 2026, but that would be a game changer in our view.

“And then they’ve got the ⁠profit generator in Starlink. The TAM on that business is pretty compelling, and I think they’re only scratching the surface.”

JOHN BELTON, PORTFOLIO MANAGER OF GABGX AT GABELLI FUNDS:

“SpaceX is the ultimate growth stock. I think this is a company with significant growth potential ahead of it. ​It’s definitely ​going to be a long-term story, and I think it will ​take time for the stock to find its footing ‌in the public markets. But there are a lot of exciting opportunities ahead.”

JAY WOODS, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST AT FREEDOM CAPITAL MARKETS:

“What we’ve seen with many high-profile IPOs is an initial surge in price followed by a period where investors give some of those gains back. I think that’s the most likely scenario here as well.”

“My concern is that retail investors who receive allocations may not take profits soon enough and could get hurt if the stock pulls back. More importantly, investors who missed the IPO ‌may chase the stock in the secondary market after a significant run-up, ​and historically those investors tend to be the most vulnerable if momentum reverses.”

MATT ​KENNEDY, SENIOR STRATEGIST AT RENAISSANCE CAPITAL, A PROVIDER OF ​IPO-FOCUSED RESEARCH AND ETFS:

“Normally I’d say that pricing at the expected terms doesn’t indicate a ton of ‌enthusiasm, but this may be the exception. Here we ​just don’t know. Sure, an ​upsizing or downsizing would have given us a signal. But the company set a single proposed price, and stuck with it.”



Source link

AI shopping agents are coming. No one is ready for them

0
AI shopping agents are coming. No one is ready for them

AI shopping agents are coming. But no one is ready.

While plenty of people are using AI models to help discover products they might want to buy, a customer cannot easily get an AI agent to complete a purchase on their behalf due to security protocols, a lack of agentic commerce standards, and retailer policies that have sought to block third-party shopping agents, said Matt Maher, the founder and CEO of M7 Innovations, an indepedent tech research and development firm.

Melissa Bridgeford, the cofounder and CEO of Wizard Commerce, which makes AI shopping agents, said that even for product discovery, existing AI models, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT often fall short. She noted that even when a user asks ChatGPT about a product type it might want to purchase, such as ski gloves, it responds with specific product recommendations only 9% of the time.

She said she thought OpenAI had fumbled its initial efforts to build its chatbot into a commerce platform, pivoting away from its Instant Checkout feature that allowed a user to complete a purchase directly from the chat interface. That decision also caused OpenAI’s initial retailers, such as Walmart, to pull out of the relationship.

She also said that she thought the industry was coalescing around allowing agentic commerce to proceed, but allowed that there was still no agreement over how to handle fraud, refunds, and returns—all major issues that could hold back the rollout of shopping agents.

Courtney Robinson, the head of policy and communications at open finance platform Akoya, said that liability in the case of fraud or if an AI agent undertakes a purchase that a customer claims they didn’t intend to make remains one of the biggest unsolved challenges holding back agentic commerce. “Regulation always follows innovation,” she said. “Liability is wide open right now and being negotiated company to company, but there are no standards around where liability sits when an agent buys something that maybe the user didn’t intend or ask for.”

Maher said that while many large companies will seek to protect themselves from legal liability for these kinds of AI agent errors through the terms and conditions of using their websites or agentic commerce gateways, he believed that using terms and conditions would not exempt the merchants from what he called “perceptual liability.” If his AI agent inadvertently bought a blazer from the Gap that he didn’t want the agent to buy, he said by way of example, he was likely still to complain to the Gap and expect a refund, especially if he is a loyal Gap customer.

Security is also a huge challenge. “We have a huge online fraud problem, ecommerce problem without agents and agents are only going to magnify the problem exponentially,” Norman Menz, CEO of cybersecurity company Flare, said. “The attack surface keeps expanding.” He said there were likely to be problems both with bad actors hijacking people’s legitimate agents and using them to make fraudulent purchases and bad actors spinning up their own agents using stolen identities and credit card information.

Adam Winnick, the cofounder and CEO of Finality, a company that uses blockchain technology to enable business, said he thought there would need to be new open source standards and systems around the monitoring and identity verification of AI agents and around ensuring that those agents had been empowered by their legitimate owners to conduct specific transactions on behalf of users. He said blockchain could play a role in such a solution, although he said there might be other ways to create such a system too.

The problem, many panelists said, was that the creation of such standards historically take years, while consumers are pushing to use AI agents for shopping now. “I think there is going to be a demand in the market to adopt and allow for the continued use of [AI shopping agents] before we have a solution to solve for fraud,” Menz said.

Ben Leventhal, the founder and CEO of Blackbird Labs, a blockchain-based dining rewards program for restaurants, said his company was close to being able to enable AI agents to search for restaurants and make reservations on a user’s behalf. He said in the restaurant space, he was less worried about payment fraud, because diners usually paid at the restaurant using a credit card, but that identity verification was still a key unsolved issue for AI agents.

Like Winnick, Leventhal said he thought blockchain technology could help solve this identity issue, but that other solutions might be possible and that existing identity management firms were likely to figure it out. “There is going to be an identity payload that people or their agent will carry with them,” he said.

Leventhal said that in the meantime it was likely that merchants would simply bear the risk of fraud, as they do currently in most “card not present” transactions, such as most ecommerce purchases, where no physical credit card is handed over and the customer is not physically there either.

He was also optimistic about the future of agentic commerce. “Innovators and entrepreneurs are going to find killer use cases and they are going to be impossible to resist,” he said. A lot of the current clunkiness of shopping through chatbots and using AI agents “will get abstracted away and this stuff will just become magical and any time you have magical software,” he said. “It just gets adopted.”



Source link

The U.S. government is betting $2 Billion on quantum computing, and the defense side can’t keep up

0
The U.S. government is betting $2 Billion on quantum computing, and the defense side can't keep up

This is why the most exposed institutional holders have been waiting. They are waiting for the coordination work to happen, which a research grant does not accomplish. The work needs an actor with the standing to convene the protocol communities, the custodians, and the regulators who must move together. No funded entity has taken on that role at the scale Bitcoin requires.

The geopolitical race

Government funding accelerated the offense. Every dollar that compounds into quantum hardware compresses the defense’s runway.

The day after the U.S. announcement, Emmanuel Macron committed €1 billion to France’s quantum strategy and called for Europe to “change the scale” of investment, naming the U.S. and China as its competitors.

China had already routed roughly $17.5 billion through three regional venture funds before the U.S. announcement landed; the U.S. move now gives Beijing the political cover to authorize another round. This is what a three-way industrial-policy race looks like, and it just compressed everyone’s planning horizon, whether they were ready or not.

What has to happen now

A serious response begins with coordinated migration work, started before the offense capability matures, because the migration has a long tail, and the runway just got shorter.

What is different about the post-quantum case is the scale of the coordination challenge. Bitcoin is uniquely exposed: any address that has ever spent funds has its public key sitting onchain in the clear, forgeable the moment elliptic curve cryptography breaks, with no way to recall it.



Source link