Home Blog Page 53

Avalanche rallies 4 days – 3 factors that could help AVAX clear $9

0
Avalanche rallies 4 days – 3 factors that could help AVAX clear $9


Avalanche [AVAX] extended its bullish push after recording four consecutive days of gains. The rally brought the token closer to reclaiming the $10 psychological level.

More significantly, AVAX broke above a multi-week pennant pattern as momentum and on-chain activity strengthened.

However, the $9 resistance remains the key hurdle separating the breakout from its $10 target.

Can AVAX hold its pennant breakout?

AVAX broke above its pennant resistance near $7.15 after several weeks of consolidation. The breakout followed four consecutive daily gains, reflecting stronger short-term buyer control.

AVAX also traded above its key Exponential Moving Averages, adding support to the bullish structure.

AVAX price analysis
Source: TradingView

If AVAX holds the former pennant resistance as support, it could challenge $9 before targeting $10. That technical breakout gained additional support from rising activity across Avalanche’s network.

Is Avalanche network activity rising?

Avalanche’s Network DEX Volume reached $141.61 million over 24 hours, marking a new monthly high.

AVAX DEXs VolumeAVAX DEXs Volume
Source: DeFiLlama

The increase reflected stronger decentralized exchange activity across the network.

However, higher DEX Volume did not independently confirm greater demand for AVAX. Meanwhile, Average Order Size data showed large orders clustered near AVAX’s current price. This suggested that whales were active as AVAX approached resistance.

Even so, Average Order Size could not establish whether those traders were accumulating or distributing. Their direction may become clearer as AVAX tests $9.

AVAX average order size dataAVAX average order size data
Source: CryptoQuant

Are AVAX longs becoming crowded?

AVAX’s Long/Short Ratio showed that Long Accounts represented approximately 70% of tracked trader positioning.

AVAX long short ratioAVAX long short ratio
Source: Coinalyze

The reading reflected a significant bullish bias among derivatives traders.

However, the concentration also increased AVAX’s exposure to a Long Squeeze. A sharp rejection near $9 could trigger Long Liquidations and accelerate a short-term pullback.

Therefore, bullish positioning supports the rally while simultaneously creating its clearest leverage risk.

Can AVAX reclaim $10?

AVAX’s pennant breakout, monthly-high DEX Volume, and whale activity strengthened its recovery outlook. However, the token must first clear the $9 resistance.

A confirmed breakout above $9 with stronger Trading Volume could open a move toward $10. By contrast, rejection could return AVAX toward its former pennant resistance.

AVAX escaped weeks of consolidation. Its next argument with the market begins at $9.


Final Summary

  • AVAX recorded four consecutive gains and broke above a multi-week pennant pattern.
  • Avalanche traded above its key Exponential Moving Averages, supporting its bullish structure.



Source link

Best CD rates today, Saturday, August 22, 2026: Best CD account earns 4.35% APY

0
Best CD rates today, Saturday, June 20, 2026: Best account provides 4% APY


Find out how much you could earn by locking in a high CD rate today. The Federal Reserve cut its federal funds rate three times in 2025. So far in 2026, the Fed has left interest rates alone, and so now could be your last chance to lock in a competitive CD rate before rates move further. CD rates vary widely across financial institutions, so it’s important to ensure you’re getting the best rate possible when shopping around for a CD.

The following is a breakdown of CD rates today and where to find the best offers.

Generally, the best CD rates today are offered on shorter terms of around one year or less. Online banks and credit unions, in particular, offer the top CD rates.

Today, Saturday, August 22, 2026, the highest CD rate is 4.35%. This rate is offered by Sallie Mae on its 3-year CD.

Here is a look at some of the best CD rates available today:

The amount of interest you can earn from a CD depends on the annual percentage rate (APY). This is a measure of your total earnings after one year, taking into account the base interest rate and how often interest compounds (CD interest typically compounds daily or monthly).

Say you invest $1,000 in a one-year CD with 1.52% APY, and interest compounds monthly. At the end of that year, your balance would grow to $1,015.20 — your initial $1,000 deposit, plus $15.20 in interest.

Now let’s say you choose a one-year CD that offers 4% APY instead. In this case, your balance would grow to $1,040.74 over the same period, which includes $40.74 in interest.

The more you deposit in a CD, the more you stand to earn. If we used the same example of a one-year CD at 4% APY but deposited $10,000, your total balance when the CD matures would be $10,407.42, meaning you’d earn $407.42 in interest. ​​

Read more: What is a good CD rate?

When choosing a CD, the interest rate is usually top of mind. However, the rate isn’t the only factor you should consider. There are several types of CDs that offer different benefits, though you may need to accept a slightly lower interest rate in exchange for more flexibility. Here’s a look at some of the common types of CDs you can consider beyond traditional CDs:

  • Bump-up CD: This type of CD allows you to request a higher interest rate if your bank’s rates go up during the account’s term. However, you’re usually allowed to “bump up” your rate just once.

  • No-penalty CD: Also known as a liquid CD, this type of CD allows you to withdraw funds before maturity without penalty.

  • Jumbo CD: These CDs require a higher minimum deposit (usually $100,000 or more), and often offer a higher interest rate in return. In today’s CD rate environment, however, the difference between traditional and jumbo CD rates may not be much.

  • Brokered CD: As the name suggests, these CDs are purchased through a brokerage rather than directly from a bank. Brokered CDs can sometimes offer higher rates or more flexible terms, but they also carry more risk and might not be FDIC-insured.



Source link

Before You Blame Your Team, Run This 5-Question Audit on Yourself

0
Before You Blame Your Team, Run This 5-Question Audit on Yourself


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Recurring team problems are often less about the team and more about the leader — running an honest self-audit can reveal the blind spots driving the pattern.
  • Real leadership growth comes not from trying to fix everything at once, but from identifying one or two habits to refine while leaning into the strengths that already make you effective.

When something isn’t working on your team, it’s natural to look outward first.

We examine performance, processes, communication and accountability. We ask why people aren’t meeting expectations or why the same problems keep showing up. Sometimes those things are the issue. But over the years, I’ve learned that recurring leadership challenges often have a common denominator: me.

Before I make assumptions about my team, I try to run what I call an emotional pattern audit. These five questions help me identify blind spots before those blind spots become barriers.

1. What problem keeps showing up repeatedly?

One of my favorite tools for self-awareness is the Enneagram because it highlights how you behave when you’re thriving versus when you’re stressed. The greatest strength a leader can have is knowing their own weaknesses.

When I notice the same frustration appearing over and over again, I stop focusing on the individual situation and start looking for the pattern. If the same challenge keeps showing up with different people or under different circumstances, there’s usually something deeper worth examining. Patterns often reveal issues that a single event cannot.

2. What role might I be playing in that pattern?

This is often the hardest question to answer honestly. For years, I thought I had a delegation problem. I couldn’t understand why everything seemed to come back to me. Then I realized I wasn’t struggling with delegation at all. I was struggling with my own understanding of my role.

I explained this recently using family photos. When my children were little, I was always the one holding the camera. I was organizing everyone and managing the moment instead of simply being in it. In business, I was doing the same thing. Instead of focusing on my responsibilities as the owner, I kept stepping into responsibilities that belonged to other people. I was unintentionally preventing ownership.

3. Am I expecting my team to be as invested as I am?

One of the hardest lessons I learned was accepting that my team will never care about the business the way I do. That’s not because they aren’t committed. In fact, they work for me because they’re committed to educating children and care about it deeply. However, that investment has a different lens than that of an owner. They’re simply not going to care about the same things I care about to the same degree that I care as the owner.

For a long time, I found myself frustrated when people didn’t show the same level of passion or urgency that I felt. Eventually, I realized I was expecting people to experience the business through my lens instead of theirs. Once I adjusted that expectation, I became a better leader because I stopped measuring commitment by whether someone thought exactly like me.

Sometimes, the feedback we’re least willing to hear is that we need to adjust our expectations, not our people.

4. Who has permission to tell me when I’m off course?

Every leader needs someone who can see what they can’t. For me, that’s often my husband. I’m a visionary by nature, which means I’m usually thinking years ahead. While that’s one of my greatest strengths, it can also become a blind spot.

Whenever I get too focused on the future, my husband jokes that I’m Icarus flying too close to the sun. What he’s really telling me is that while I’m looking at the horizon, there are things happening right in front of me that need my attention. I have similar people at work, too, people who can prod me back onto the right path.

The best leaders don’t surround themselves with people who always agree with them. They surround themselves with people who are willing to tell them the truth.

5. Am I acting from intention or habit?

Once you’ve identified a pattern, the next question is whether it’s something that can actually change. There are things about me that I can improve. I can communicate more clearly. I can create better systems. I can be more intentional in how I lead. There are also things that are simply part of who I am. I’m always going to be a visionary. I’m always going to care deeply about people.

Growth doesn’t happen when we try to become someone else, but when we learn to refine the habits that hold us back while leaning into the strengths that make us effective.

Turning awareness into action

Identifying a pattern is only the beginning. The next step is deciding whether it’s something you can change and then creating a simple plan to address it. One mistake I see leaders make is trying to fix everything at once. If you discover that you’re avoiding difficult conversations, struggling with delegation or creating confusion through unclear communication, don’t create a ten-step improvement plan. Pick one area and focus on making consistent progress.

I like to identify no more than three action items. For example, if clarity is the issue, I might commit to ending every meeting with clearly defined ownership and next steps. If delegation is the issue, I might choose one responsibility to fully hand off instead of continuing to check in on it. If emotional awareness is the issue, I might ask a trusted colleague to tell me when they notice I’m operating from stress instead of intention.

Just as importantly, check back in with the people affected by the change. Ask whether they’re seeing improvement and whether there’s anything you’re still missing. Leadership growth isn’t about making assumptions. It’s about creating feedback loops that help you improve over time.

The leaders who grow the fastest aren’t the ones who never have blind spots. They’re the ones willing to identify them, work on them, and measure their progress honestly.

Key Takeaways

  • Recurring team problems are often less about the team and more about the leader — running an honest self-audit can reveal the blind spots driving the pattern.
  • Real leadership growth comes not from trying to fix everything at once, but from identifying one or two habits to refine while leaning into the strengths that already make you effective.

When something isn’t working on your team, it’s natural to look outward first.

We examine performance, processes, communication and accountability. We ask why people aren’t meeting expectations or why the same problems keep showing up. Sometimes those things are the issue. But over the years, I’ve learned that recurring leadership challenges often have a common denominator: me.

Before I make assumptions about my team, I try to run what I call an emotional pattern audit. These five questions help me identify blind spots before those blind spots become barriers.



Source link

Blockchain Association and CCI sue Illinois over Digital Asset Tax Act – Details

0
Blockchain Association and CCI sue Illinois over Digital Asset Tax Act – Details


In a recent crypto market update, the Blockchain Association and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) have legally challenged Illinois’s new Digital Asset Tax Act. The former argues that Illinois went beyond its constitutional authority by creating a tax specifically targeting digital-asset activity. 

The press release added, 

Our lawsuit asks the court to declare the Digital Asset Tax Act unlawful and enter preliminary and permanent injunctive relief barring the State from enforcing it.

Illinois goes against various clauses

Additionally, the lawsuit claims that the Illinois’s new Digital Asset Tax Act goes against the Dormant Commerce Clause. For those unaware, the latter is a legal doctrine derived from the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause, which prevents individual states from creating tax or regulatory systems that unfairly discriminate against or place excessive burdens on interstate commerce.

Expressing discontent on the same, Ji Hun Kim, Chief Executive Officer, Crypto Council for Innovation, said, 

A tax on digital asset activity with no equivalent tax for traditional assets unlawfully picks winners and losers through the tax code.

Crypto community challenges Illinois

Their concern is that if one state creates a special tax on digital-asset activity, other states might follow and introduce their own rules and taxes. That could eventually create a fragmented system in which a company operating across the U.S. has to deal with a different digital-asset tax structure in every state.

Besides this, the lawsuit also alleges that the Illinois’ law violates the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA). For context, the ITFA generally restricts certain discriminatory taxes on Internet access and certain forms of electronic commerce. 

Expressing on the matter, Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, added, 

We are bringing this challenge to protect those fundamental principles and ensure Illinois stays within the bounds of the law.

Procedural challenges that are acting as blockers

That said, the crypto community is challenging both the tax itself and how it was passed. They argue that the Digital Asset Tax Act moved through the Illinois legislature within hours, without enough debate, public notice, or opportunity for affected businesses and residents to provide input.

They also argue that the law raises due process concerns because its requirements may be unclear. It’s expected for businesses and users to need to know when the tax applies and how much they owe. If the rules are vague, the groups claim that could violate constitutional protections. 

States have an important role to play in fostering innovation, but that authority has constitutional limits.

This coincided with the Blockchain Association supporting the recent U.S. SEC proposal to revise the outdated clauses of Regulation NMS—Rules 611 and 610(e).


Final Summary

  • The lawsuit claims that the Illinois’s new Digital Asset Tax Act goes against the Dormant Commerce Clause. 
  • The Digital Asset Tax Act moved through the Illinois legislature within hours. 



Source link

Apple Announced Its Largest-Ever Stock Buyback Under Tim Cook’s Leadership. Here’s Why the Size of the Repurchase Program Matters for Shareholders.

0
Apple Announced Its Largest-Ever Stock Buyback Under Tim Cook's Leadership. Here's Why the Size of the Repurchase Program Matters for Shareholders.


When Tim Cook became CEO of Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) in 2011, one of his biggest strategic shifts was returning capital to shareholders. He reinstated the company’s dividend in 2012 and, more importantly, launched a massive stock buyback program.

Apple has spent more than any other company on stock buybacks over the last 10 years, according to research by The Motley Fool. Here’s a closer look at how much it has spent and why this benefits shareholders.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Apple’s stock buybacks during Tim Cook’s tenure

Cook has been part of multiple record-breaking share buybacks while CEO of Apple. Near the beginning of his tenure, the board authorized a $10 billion buyback for its fiscal 2013, but later raised that to $60 billion, the largest single share-repurchase authorization in history. It authorized repurchases of $100 billion in 2018 and $110 billion in 2024, with the latter still being its largest-ever buyback. In 2025 and 2026, it authorized $100 billion in buybacks.

A buyback authorization only means a company can spend up to that amount, not that it will. Apple normally uses most of it, though, and has bought back a whopping $877 billion in shares under Cook’s leadership.

A (mostly) positive move for Apple shareholders

After Apple buys back shares, it retires them. With fewer shares in circulation, every shareholder owns a larger slice of the company. Over a quarter or even a year, this is a relatively minor change. At Apple’s market cap of $4.6 trillion (as of Aug. 19), a $100 billion repurchase authorization means buying back a little over 2% of the company.

But for a long-term investor, it makes a significant difference. Case in point, when Cook took over, Apple had about 26 billion split-adjusted outstanding shares. It reported 14.6 billion outstanding shares as of July 2026, so the share count has fallen by about 44%. A share purchased at the start of Cook’s tenure now owns nearly 80% more than it did then.

The caveat here is that Apple’s valuation has risen significantly since the early days of its buyback program. It traded between 12 and 18 times earnings for much of the 2010s. It trades at 36 times trailing earnings as of this writing, while Apple and other top tech stocks have seen considerable price appreciation. Buying back shares at a higher valuation means less added value for shareholders.

Apple’s repurchase program was a major tailwind for most of Cook’s tenure. However, John Ternus will become the company’s new CEO on Sept. 1, 2026, and the leadership transition could also signal a shift in strategy. Buybacks will remain part of Apple’s approach, but the company may divert some of that capital to research and development or building through acquisitions. Given Apple’s somewhat expensive valuation, either could prove a better growth driver than buying back shares.

Should you buy stock in Apple right now?

Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut are built for long-term growth and could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $429,223!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,318,055!*

That performance is why people listen. With a track record of beating the S&P 500 by nearly 5x, Stock Advisor offers a distinct advantage. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built for the long haul.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of August 22, 2026.

Lyle Daly has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Apple Announced Its Largest-Ever Stock Buyback Under Tim Cook’s Leadership. Here’s Why the Size of the Repurchase Program Matters for Shareholders. was originally published by The Motley Fool



Source link

Delek Logistics CFO Buys 1,500 Shares for $75,000. Here’s a Closer Look at the Transaction.

0
Delek Logistics CFO Buys 1,500 Shares for $75,000. Here's a Closer Look at the Transaction.


Robert G. Wright, Chief Financial Officer of Delek Logistics Partners, LP (NYSE:DKL), executed a direct purchase of 1,500 shares of common units on August 13, 2026 according to a recent SEC Form 4 filing.

Transaction summary

Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($50.00); post-transaction value based on August 13, 2026 market close ($52.30).

Key questions

  • What was the relative scale of this acquisition for the CFO?
    The addition of 1,500 shares expanded the executive’s direct stake by nearly a quarter, indicating a substantial relative increase in their personal equity commitment to the firm.

  • How does the execution price align with the partnership’s recent equity performance?
    The purchase at $50.00 per share was executed while the partnership’s one-year total return stood at 20% as of the August 13, 2026 transaction date.

  • What is the current level of internal ownership for the executive?
    Following this transaction, the CFO maintains direct beneficial ownership of 7,994 shares, which carries a market value of $431,755.94 based on the $54.01 price as of the August 14, 2026 market close.

  • Does this transaction involve any derivative or indirect holdings?
    The filing reflects only direct common unit ownership, with no reported indirect entities or associated derivative securities, such as stock options or warrants, held by the reporting owner.

Company Overview

Company Snapshot

  • Delek Logistics Partners operates a diversified portfolio of logistics and marketing assets for crude oil, intermediate, and refined petroleum products, generating revenue through its various segments, including Storage and Transportation, Wholesale Marketing and Terminalling, and Pipeline Joint Venture Investments.

  • The company generates earnings through the transportation and storage of petroleum products via its pipeline network and trucking fleet, as well as through wholesale marketing and terminalling operations that facilitate product distribution across the United States.

  • The company serves major petroleum refiners, producers, and downstream distributors throughout the United States, positioning itself as a critical infrastructure provider in the midstream energy sector.

Delek Logistics Partners is a substantial midstream energy infrastructure operator with $1.2 billion in trailing 12-month revenue and a market cap of $2.9 billion. The company’s integrated logistics platform provides essential transportation and marketing services for petroleum products, leveraging its extensive pipeline network and terminalling facilities to capture value across the crude oil and refined products supply chain.



Source link

Analyzing Pepe’s 61% rally – Can the memecoin flip its macro structure?

0
Analyzing Pepe’s 61% rally – Can the memecoin flip its macro structure?


Over the past week, the memecoin sector has been one of the strongest performers in the crypto market, according to Glassnode data. Dogecoin [DOGE], the undisputed memecoin leader, was up 33% in a week.

Meanwhile, Pepe [PEPE] has rallied 61% in the same period. In the past 24 hours alone, it has climbed 23.9%, with the daily trading volume up 123%, per CoinMarketCap data.

The spot inflows were strong, with an $8.18 million inflow on the 21st of August. This reflected notable aggressive buying pressure. Will PEPE see continued buying? Should traders book profits instead and anticipate a momentum reversal?

Is the demand for Pepe too hot for comfort?

Over the past three days, Open Interest behind PEPE perpetuals has risen by over 50%, Coinalyze data confirmed.

Pepe Spot Volume Bubble Map
Source: CryptoQuant

The derivatives market’s fervor was matched by rising spot trading volume. The spot volume bubble map above showed that volume has been heating up over the past month.

When volume surges to overheating levels, it can be a warning sign. Contextually, the rally could be a bear market rally, the data warned, and the rapid price gains were being used to take profits while retail crowds FOMO-ed in.

Traders’ call to action- Take profits and wait

PEPE 1-day ChartPEPE 1-day Chart
Source: PEPE/USDT on TradingView

The CMF was at +0.32, confirming the heavy buying pressure. The MACD also reflected the hefty upward momentum of the past few days.

Yet, the swing structure on the 1-day timeframe was bearish. The local supply zone at $0.0000031 was decisively beaten.

The heavy trading volume, rocketing Open Interest, short liquidations, and the intense bullish market sentiment swing following Bitcoin’s [BTC] move of 23% within a week helped Pepe on a remarkable rally.

A daily session close above the swing high at $0.00000459 will confirm a bullish swing structure shift. Until then, traders and investors must be wary of the long-term downtrend.

A bullish structure shift followed by a pullback toward key former resistance zones, such as $0.0000031 or $0.0000040, can offer a buying opportunity.

Meanwhile, a price slump back below $0.0000031 would indicate the bears remain in control of the PEPE trend.


Final Summary

  • The PEPE spot trading volume was heating up, which could be an unhealthy sign for the memecoin’s bulls.
  • The swing structure on the 1-day price chart remained bearish despite the strong recent gains.



Source link